Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martha McSally Announces Transition Team(Jim Kolbe & other RINOS)
Mcsally For Congress ^

Posted on 12/20/2014 1:05:24 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Mr Rogers
Are you suggesting it is a lie?

I am suggesting it's MEANINGLESS.

21 posted on 12/20/2014 6:38:54 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Time will tell. I wish we could make a bet.


22 posted on 12/20/2014 7:16:59 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

” Won’t matter. McSally is a Chamber of Commerce bought politician.

Chamber of Commerce wants Obamacare since it moves the cost of health-care from their members onto individuals including covering the costs of Illegals.

And of course, McSally will vote for Amnesty.

I’m not sure how she helps except to move the GOP to the left. “

Today, Jan 14,2015, we got our proof (we knew it anyway)


23 posted on 01/14/2015 1:31:00 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; stephenjohnbanker
That’s exactly what a bunch of FReepers said about Raul Labrador in 2010. I think I’ll wait to see what her voting record is like before declaring her to be Gabby Giffords with an R next to her name. (But I’ll go out on a limb and assert that she won’t have as conservative a voting record as Labrador does, given that her district is 20% less Republican than Labrador’s district.)

See post #23 for an explanation of the proof you desired.
24 posted on 01/14/2015 5:59:59 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; stephenjohnbanker

What’s the proof? That she cast a vote, joined by over 90% of House Republicans (and virtually no Democrats), to defund Obama’s executive-order amnesty of November? Watch out, La Raza, apparently over 90% of House Republicans are prospective members!


25 posted on 01/15/2015 2:23:01 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

La Raza is clearly more conservative than the eeeeeeeeeeeeevil Chamber of Commerce.


26 posted on 01/15/2015 5:03:52 AM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; stephenjohnbanker
What’s the proof? That she cast a vote, joined by over 90% of House Republicans (and virtually no Democrats), to defund Obama’s executive-order amnesty of November? Watch out, La Raza, apparently over 90% of House Republicans are prospective members!

Today was a tricky one for many Representatives in swing districts, and Arizona Reps. Kyrsten Sinema (D-CD9) and Martha McSally (R-CD2) issued statements that ignored some of their thornier votes.

Arizona's Politics has been detailing the votes on some of the amendments related to immigration and President Obama's executive actions proposed by Republicans.  The amendments were attached to the Homeland Security funding bill.

While Sinema and McSally both voted the party line on the final bill - which 
passed 236-191 with only 2 Democrats and 10 Republicans crossing lines - both crossed party lines on at least one of the amendments.

Sinema was one of 14 Democrats to vote for Arizona colleague Matt Salmon's (R-CD5) amendment, and McSally was one of 26 Republicans to vote against the Blackburn amendment to defund the immigration-related executive actions.


Ask and ye shall receive!
27 posted on 01/15/2015 5:54:34 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; stephenjohnbanker

Yawn. Given that the Chamber of Commerce supports amnesty for illegal aliens in general, not just for the small number of “Dreamers” that Obama half-legalized in DACA (but didn’t place on a path to citizenship) about a year ago, the fact that McSally voted for defunding Obama’s November executive-order amnesty that half-legalizes millions of additional illegal aliens is a huge slap in the face of the Chamber of Commerce. Your predictions that McSally would be a CoC lackey that would support amnesty have been proven wrong, at least so far.

Regarding the Blackburn amendment, House Republicans separated it from the general bill because they knew that *defunding DACA would never withstand a filibuster in the Senate*, and thus trying to defund DACA would sink the entire bill unless it was separated. As we speak, Harry Reid is scheming to have the Senate vote on the Homeland Security funding with the Blackburn amendment attached to it in an attempt to have the Senate filibuster the whole kit and caboodle, while Senate Republicans need to hold firm and have two separate votes, one for the general bill and one for the Blackburn amendment. So, disappointing as it was for McSally and 25 other Republicans to have voted against the Blackburn amendment, it will have zero effect on anything, other than in protecting her from 2016 attack ads featuring nuclear engineers brought to America illegally at the age of 2. The big vote was on the general funding bill, Roll Call 35, in which McSally joined Jim Jordan, Louie Gohmert, Steve King and just about every other conservative Republican (plus the only two Democrats that represent a district in which Romney got 53% or more of the vote) in prohibiting the use of funds for the enforcement of Obama’s massive November 2014 executive-order amnesty. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll035.xml


28 posted on 01/15/2015 6:41:40 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson