Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

The problem with the tank is that other systems delivering the same death potential (RPV’s and bombers) have a significantly lower logistics cost. It is difficult and slow to get the tank to where you need it and the cost of keeping it fightable (fuel and maintenance) is exorbitant. Many of the places where you would use the tank are not suitable for maneuver, so the tanks get bogged down or restricted to a few easily attacked routes. The Army would like to forgo the high fixed cost and low utility of the tank for more modern methods.


22 posted on 12/20/2014 5:25:05 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

Relying on airpower works if we only bomb third world countries but that approach is dead in the water if we fight someone like Russia or China that actually has a modern air force and air defense systems.


56 posted on 12/20/2014 7:57:13 AM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson