See post 46, this goes far deeper than what you are attempting to dismiss it as.
If you want a world where TMZ, and not a judge and jury, decides a person's fate, well, you're welcome to it!
Here are some of the details in an article from Slate of all places:
In the emotionally charged conversation about rape, few topics are more fraught than that of false allegations. Consider some responses to the news that singer-songwriter Conor Oberst had been falsely accused of sexual assault. Last December a woman writing in the comments section of the website xoJane, going by the name Joanie Faircloth, claimed Oberst raped her when she was a teenager. The charge spread across the Internet; Oberst denied it and brought a libel suit against Faircloth when she refused to retract the story. In July she completely recanted, admitting that she had made it all up to get attention. Yet instead of showing sympathy for the ordeal of the musicianone known for being supportive of feminist issuessome chided him for taking legal action to defend himself against a false, career-damaging charge. In the Daily Dot, pop culture critic Chris Ostendorf decried the lawsuit, arguing that it could intimidate real victims of rape and that it promoted the idea of men as victims of false accusationseven though thats exactly what Oberst was. After Oberst dropped the suit, Bustles Caroline Pate praised his decision and referred to the saga as a roller-coaster for both partiestreating the false accuser and the wrongly accused as morally equivalentand called the revelation of Obersts innocence crushingly disappointing.
The rest of the article has a lot to say.
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/09/false_rape_accusations_why_must_be_pretend_they_never_happen.html