Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yashcheritsiy

That is wrong. Most narcotics cross the southern border of the United States, and THAT alone makes is a federal jurisdiction.


95 posted on 12/18/2014 8:32:36 PM PST by Up Yours Marxists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Up Yours Marxists
Most narcotics cross the southern border of the United States, and THAT alone makes is a federal jurisdiction.

That would be an exercise of the power of Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations.

What does that have to do with CO exercising its 10th Amendment authority?

96 posted on 12/18/2014 8:42:23 PM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: Up Yours Marxists
That is wrong. Most narcotics cross the southern border of the United States, and THAT alone makes is a federal jurisdiction.

Nope. FedGov doesn't have a constitutional right to make drug laws in the first place, therefore it can never actually be constitutional for something involving them to be "federal jurisdiction."

148 posted on 12/20/2014 6:13:26 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy (It's time to repeal and replace the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson