Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

One additional thing to note is that there is an urgency (some would say emergency) from the side that is filing against Obama.

Note: THERE IS NO EMERGENCY OR EVEN URGENCY FROM OBAMA’S SIDE.

What this means is that if a preliminary injunction is granted, there is no compelling reason why Obama should be able to speed up the legal process. In other words, the courts do not need to consider disrupting their scheduled cases in order to allow Obama to butt in.

Further this means that a preliminary injunction could remain in place for a year or more.


2 posted on 12/17/2014 4:28:18 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

One additional piece of information: the enforcement of a preliminary injunction order would be carried out by United States Marshalls assigned to Federal Courts.

Holder’s justice department is not in the loop.


4 posted on 12/17/2014 4:31:16 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage
Found it:

Obama tells Federal judge to stay out of the debate

7 posted on 12/17/2014 4:51:57 AM PST by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson