Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jameslalor

Since the courts allow DUI checkpoints it’s already established that they don’t need a valid reason for a traffic stop.


50 posted on 12/16/2014 8:44:37 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

“Since the courts allow DUI checkpoints it’s already established that they don’t need a valid reason for a traffic stop.”

Wrong. You’re confusing your misunderstanding for law.

RS is still required for virtually all stops. A single limited exception, under certain circumstances, does not mean that there’s no need in all the other cases of traffic stops.


58 posted on 12/16/2014 9:12:44 AM PST by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson