Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Warren: ‘I Am Not Running For President’
The Daily Caller ^ | December 15, 2014 | Al Weaver

Posted on 12/15/2014 8:56:47 AM PST by Bettyprob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not Running? How many ways and in how many languages, can you say “Horsesh*t!”?

The hostility between the Current Regime and the Clintons is palpable. If the Current Occupant wants any control over the course of his “legacy”, allowing Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless, to succeed him in office is absolutely not the way the way to go.


21 posted on 12/15/2014 9:31:44 AM PST by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Why worry about other people parsing your words if you can just flat out lie without any repercussions?...


22 posted on 12/15/2014 9:47:23 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

She would easily beat Bush or Christie.


23 posted on 12/15/2014 9:48:05 AM PST by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Exactly.

Of course, she’s not “running for President” in the active tense at this very moment.


24 posted on 12/15/2014 9:59:47 AM PST by ScottinVA (We either destroy ISIS there... or fight them here. Pick one, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

If Elizabeth Warren is telling the truth when she claims that she’s not running for president; and if she’s also telling the truth when she claims to be a liberal Democrat who wants to help the poor, then she’d be endorsing another liberal Democrat at this time to oppose the centrist, baggage-ridden Hillary in the primaries.

But she isn’t doing that. What she is doing is hurting the foolish liberals who support her. On the one hand, if she does decide to run, there’ll be videos of her all over the airwaves lying that she was not going to run, making her an even weaker candidate than she otherwise would have been. But, on the other hand, if she keeps her word not to run without endorsing another liberal candidate, the liberals will be left with no one to support and Hillary will sweep all before her on her way to the nomination.

So is Elizabeth Warren working undercover for Hillary, to whom she can donate her liberal supporters when the time is right to assure Hillary an uncontested coronation at the DNC convention? Or is she working undercover for the Republicans, who will benefit from having her continue her machinations that will alienate liberal Democrats and keep them away from the voting booths in November 2016?


25 posted on 12/15/2014 11:07:56 AM PST by Bluestocking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa
She would easily beat Bush or Christie.

That's what I meant by a "decent" candidate.

Jeb Bush or Chris Christie don't meet that criteria. They are just "Democrat-lite".

26 posted on 12/15/2014 12:04:36 PM PST by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob
The only thing Elizabeth Warren is good at running is her mouth.

In her lifetime has she ever actually been responsible for running any kind of a business?

27 posted on 12/15/2014 2:55:52 PM PST by dearolddad (/i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson