Nothing against objectivity. Some of their best friends are objective, I’m sure. They probably even have relatives that are objective.
Ramos the Mexican citizen?
The acolyte of Fidel Castro, the Spanish hegemonist determined to take back the land from the Anglos?
That Jorge Ramos?
He would have served Stalin or Castro well as a loyal propagandist. At least he put the world on notice never to believe anything he says or writes. There are many like him.
Well, it seems to me he contradicts himself. If 5 is the correct number rather than seven and should be reported as such, why wouldn’t 0 be the correct number that should be reported in the Jackie case? Oh, that’s right, there’s no story when 0 is the number.
Journalism, like Elvis, left the building years ago.
Here’s a “narrative.” There are evil people trying to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America by taking away our freedom and our property. One of their “weapons” is biased and lying journalism. Back at ya, Jorge.
Most “journalists” wouldn’t recognize Truth if they met at a cocktail party.
They’re not smart enough to recognize, or critical enough to question, orthodoxy.
...unless we happen to agree with, or are being paid off by the power, in which case it's just peachy. This is exactly what we saw in most of Obama's first term.
“that we have a moral obligation to tell truth to power.”
Isn’t this some line from the Daily Show?
And since when do these jokers ever stand up to Obama and his “power”?
Of course they can make stuff up, "its the seriousness of the charge, not the reality" But maybe the next R Admin will stand up and fight back with facts. Similar to what Cheney did on Meet the Press, yesterday. Why didn't they let him do that under Bush, with all the spurious charges?
Couldn’t get passed the first paragraph. Total barf!