Posted on 12/15/2014 5:30:21 AM PST by iowamark
The Army has disciplined a military chaplain for making references to the Bible during a suicide-prevention seminar last month.
A serviceman brought the Judeo-Christian religious content to the attention of an atheist group, which complained about it. Now, the chaplain is fighting back, maintaining he did nothing wrong.
The dispute has renewed a debate over the appropriate role of faith in the military.
The chaplain, Capt. Joe Lawhorn, conducted the training session on suicide prevention Nov. 20 at the University of North Georgia. During the session, he shared his personal struggles with depression while an Army Ranger.
What upset the atheist group is that Lawhorn explained how he learned to conquer adversity by following the example of Israel’s warrior king, David, one of the great heroes of the Old Testament.
A week later, on Thanksgiving, Lawhorn received a letter of concern from Col. David Fivecoat, commander of the Airborne and Ranger Training Brigade at Fort Benning, Ga.
Fivecoat’s letter faulted Lawhorn for “using Christian scriptures and solutions”:
During this training, you advocated, or were perceived to advocate for Christianity and used Christian scripture and solutions. This is in direct contrast with Army Regulation 600-20 and violates the Army’s Equal Opportunity Policy.
The letter, described as “administrative in nature,” also issued a stern warning to Lawhorn to be “careful to avoid any perception you are advocating one system of beliefs over another.” It will remain in the chaplain’s file for up to three years.
Still at issue is whether Lawhorn improperly inserted his evangelical Christian beliefs into the suicide-prevention training session or was simply speaking from personal experience.
Col. Ron Crews, a retired military chaplain who is now executive director of Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, came to Lawhorn’s defense. He urged the Army to reconsider its actions and remove the letter from Lawhorn’s file:
According to some who were present, Chaplain Lawhorn made clear on multiple occasions that he provided his personal experiences of dealing with depression merely as one example among many alternatives. At no time did he say his way was the only or even the preferred way of dealing with depression. And at no time did he deny the validity of any other methods.
Crews also noted that no one at the training session filed a formal complaint. Instead, he said, one Ranger in attendance took a photo of a handout distributed by Lawhorn and posted it on the Facebook page of the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers. The group bills itself as a “national non-profit building community for atheists and humanists in the military.”
Crews said the organization’s president, Jason Torpy, proceeded to make an issue of it by writing a series of articles on Lawhorn’s suicide-prevention briefing.
That’s “not the point,” Torpy said in a telephone interview with The Daily Signal:
This chaplain violated the privilege and responsibility he had and he exploited that opportunity to push his personal religious beliefs on the captive audience of military personnel. So it doesn’t matter where the complaint came from.
Since no recording has surfaced, Torpy points to the handout as proof that Lawhorn replaced “sound suicide-prevention training with that chaplain’s personal, evangelical interest.” He said:
You can see clearly from the handout what people in that assembled mass saw was a chaplain promoting his personal beliefs as an integral part of the activity through a handout with Christian counseling centers, Bibles verses and the core Christian message. No amount of ‘Well, this is just my personal beliefs’ makes it OK.
On the front of the handout, Lawhorn drew from the Bible’s Book of Psalms and referenced its central Jewish figure, David, as an example of how to manage thoughts of depression and suicide.
On the back, Lawhorn provided referrals for local counseling along with other crisis contacts in government.
The Daily Signal, researching the counseling centers listed by Lawhorn, discovered that only two of the four were affiliated with a particular religion. The secular referrals were North Georgia Counseling and Education Center and MAM Counseling Inc.
The Liberty Institute, a nonprofit legal group specializing in religious liberty, helped Lawhorn file an official response last Tuesday to the Army. In a press release, Mike Berry, senior counsel and director of military affairs, said:
It is outrageous that an Army chaplain would have his career threatened because he cared so much about his soldiers that he opened up to them about his personal struggles and what worked for him.
Critical thinking, logic, reasoning... all foreign concepts to the Left
We lost our way. A chaplin cant mention the bible because one asshat feels insulted. Shame
So: get rid of chaplains and employ psychologists and social workers.
Because who needs faith when they’re far from home and facing death and killing people?
Well, I’m an atheist and former military, and even I think this is ridiculous. He’s a chaplain. What did they expect him to talk about? It’s his JOB for pete’s sake.
God has confounded our thinking ...we are doomed.
Let’s see, Order of Saint Maurice (Infantry), Order of Saint Barbara (Field Artillery), Order of Saint George (Armor and Cav) . . .
There’s only so much agnosticism you can expect when joining any military force anywhere in the world. Even the Soviets couldn’t keep Orthodoxy from flourishing in Afghanistan.
Fretting about a CHAPLAIN talking about God while Iraq and Afghanistan burn, Russia invades its neighbors with impunity, ISIS is running over the ME all while the force is reduced and demoralized is an example of how the “leadership” in the Pentagon and the White House are the greatest threats to national security.
Most Nazis were atheists and Hoe did that workout.
A godless government, school, workplace........(?)
wow
I must admit a small bit of agreement with the complaint.
I have attended numerous technical seminars and training sessions where the instructors insist on dragging in their personal religious and/or political beliefs. Even when I more or less agree with those beliefs, that’s not why I am attending.
Whether there is a truly legitimate complaint here or not depends entirely on the specifics of what happened. Without a recording, there’s no way to settle that definitively.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
