Ohio Ping
I never would have guessed that Portman would stand with Cruz on a point of order supporting the Constitution.
Portman’s thinking election 2016, obviously.
There was a time when Portman was an extremely conservative representative in the House from Ohio’s very conservative 2d district.
Portman should aim to be a Pete Wilson or Scott Brown type of RINO.
Portman is better on immigration than many of the self professed social conservatives like Ayotte, Rubio and Rand. He is a RINO but he is more informed than Rand, Rubio and probably most of the Senate on the issue.
He was the actual moderate while Schumer rammed through the 1986 amnesty.
http://cis.org/tale-of-two-senators
But he believed that the bill, far from solving the problem of worker verification, would compound it, extending the past failures far into the future. Rather than showing Congresss ability to solve problems, he believed, it would demonstrate its capacity to perpetuate them. He was convinced that the promised reform would prove to be a damaging policy failure.
IRCAS Shadow
Portman was haunted by IRCAs failure. He saw it as corrosive not only of immigration control but also of public trust in government. The 1986 bill casts a long shadow on this place, Portman said in his June 26 exchange with Schumer, and weve got to be sure we dont repeat those mistakes.”
SNIP
Without effective verification, there can be no effective enforcement of the borders. Without effective enforcement, there can be no immigration reform worthy of the name. The choice for the House is clear: legislate or pretend.17
Portman believed that the Senate bill was a form of pretending. He thought that worker verification had been compromised to placate powerful political interests, just as it had been in 1986.
Look, it is, frankly, not a very popular part of the legislation, and over the years it hasnt been, Portman said on June 26. In 1986 it wasnt. That is why it was never implemented, because there is sort of an unholy alliance among employers, among those representing labor union members, among those representing certain constituent groups who feel there might be some discrimination or other issues.