Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz's moves on spending bill roil Republicans
news.yahoo.com ^ | 12/14/14 | Donna Cassata

Posted on 12/14/2014 6:10:42 AM PST by cotton1706

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: cotton1706

Noteworthy that Portman voted with the Good Guys.


21 posted on 12/14/2014 6:59:10 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Everybody
The fight continues with the next Congress.
Support Cruz, Sessions and Lee




Defund executive amnesty

Contact the Senate DC and home offices here .

Contact the Senators via Twitter handles, here.

Tweet EVERY Senator...especially the RINO’s....

#StopObamasAmnesty, #DefundObamasAmnesty
#CruzControl

22 posted on 12/14/2014 7:00:29 AM PST by RedMDer (I don't listen to Liars but when I do I know it's Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
I agree with Cruz' position on this, but Cruz is not "lookin' good on this." Harry Reid ate his lunch.

While Cruz was speaking against the bill (I agree with his position) and against the illegal amnesty (I agree with his position), Reid was taking the opportunity to tee up a couple of dozen Obama nominees to get voted on Monday morning. If Cruz had let the Senate be in recess until Monday morning, all of the debate (if that's what you can call it) and maneuvering on the omnibus spending monstrosity would have been done then. Instead, Cruz had the votes Saturday night and LOST each of them. Now Harry Reid will use the Monday morning session to give lifetime appointments to a bunch of Obama judges and confirm some other controversial appointees. He might have been able to do that on Monday afternoon, but probably not as many since all the Demoncrat senators would want to go home.

I would say Cruz won the battle but lost the war, but he didn't even win the battle. He didn't even get a "moral" victory by putting everyone on record - the bill passed and Obama is going to get more wacko liberals in office. Mr. Cruz needs to learn the rules of the Senate before he decides he is ready to run for president. That's why we need a governor to run on the Republican side - they usually understand the difference between having a legislative strategy and just saying anything they want.

23 posted on 12/14/2014 7:00:47 AM PST by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Well said.


24 posted on 12/14/2014 7:00:56 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
Portman did that because he is going to have a tough re-election campaign. He was trying to protect his right flank, he doesn't hold to principles. I say this because he flipped on homosexual "marriage", not because he suddenly decided his principles were wrong, but because of a point of personal interest (his son came out).

IMHO he is going to have a hard time holding his seat in 2016.

25 posted on 12/14/2014 7:05:18 AM PST by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Thank God Roberts voted no.


26 posted on 12/14/2014 7:05:23 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

People can say what they will about Freddie. But you gotta admit, the dude could strut ;)


27 posted on 12/14/2014 7:05:29 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Both Kansas senators exhibited they have a spine.


28 posted on 12/14/2014 7:06:14 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

“Oh, but there was an endgame...to get every senator, especially the republicans, on the record.”

Yep, and how many of the GOP-e candidates ran on repealing Obamacare? Now they fully funded it for another year!

Lying bastiges!


29 posted on 12/14/2014 7:09:53 AM PST by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Cochran (R-MS) voted NAY?


30 posted on 12/14/2014 7:14:13 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I,m surprised that Thune supported Cruz.


31 posted on 12/14/2014 7:15:08 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

WI has a recall provision; but the U.S. Senate and House recognize no recall petitions from any state.


32 posted on 12/14/2014 7:17:09 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Like Orrin Grant Hatch of UT, Enzi was initially seen upon his election to the Senate and a firm, unyielding conservatives. Must have never been true


33 posted on 12/14/2014 7:20:04 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Wish I could say the same but my Pa clown senators toed the McConnell/Reid uni-party line.


34 posted on 12/14/2014 7:21:23 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

If we get the WH again, prez should just declare that 0bama’s nominees are declared void. End. Should not enforce any 0bamacare provision. Do not enforce and EPA reg. Do not enforce any Dept of Ed. edicts. Just. Stop. Enforcing.

The whole prosecutorial discretion thing is going to make HUGE swings depending on who is president... until the legislative branch takes back their powers.


35 posted on 12/14/2014 7:26:01 AM PST by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

“Noteworthy that Portman voted with the Good Guys.”

Yeah, I’m sure his 2016 election and possibly the vice-presidency played a role.


36 posted on 12/14/2014 7:27:57 AM PST by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BruceS

Reid wouldn’t have put through the nominations because... he’s a nice guy?
LOL!
Every one of those nominations would have gone through anyway.
Cruz and Lee lost nothing.

The gain was long-term: having supporters of the amnesty on record.
This ‘cromnibus’ has made a lot of Republicans take votes their constituents didn’t like, Cruz and Lee made at least some Dems make a vote their constituents don’t like.


37 posted on 12/14/2014 7:29:18 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BruceS

“While Cruz was speaking against the bill (I agree with his position) and against the illegal amnesty (I agree with his position), Reid was taking the opportunity to tee up a couple of dozen Obama nominees to get voted on Monday morning.”

You’re buying into the talking point. Reid was going to do that anyway, and everybody knew it. Reid was not going to let those nominees just expire while he had the power to act on them. He’s a militant leftist.


38 posted on 12/14/2014 7:31:14 AM PST by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

And something else— the FIRST actual budget in how many years? Because prior years— the dems in Senate and the House majority would not ever pass an OBAMA budget as their own.

So this is exposing the lying shiite of Reid and Co., who never proposed a budget of their own to answer obamas’/

This is some inside baseball crap. Cruz exposed the RINOS, the dems who said yes were a mix of outgoing and staying dems, much reduced of course. Nice little piece of faux footwork on McConnell’s and Boehner’s part.


39 posted on 12/14/2014 7:31:24 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Roils RINOs but not true Republicans.


40 posted on 12/14/2014 7:35:16 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson