[Steve_Seattle]

The article mentions only one rifle being found, but the photo shows two, in addition to a large quantity of ammo. I'm wondering if the photo is of the woman's weapons, or is a stock photo from some other story having nothing to do with the woman. To me, "armed to the teeth" does not apply to ONE rifle.

Also, you have to read deep into the article to discover that she was photographing a decorative helicopter to be posted to a pro-military website, whereas the initial impression is that she was some sort of armed terrorist photographing the base for some nefarious purpose.

[TexasGator]

“The article mentions only one rifle being found, but the photo shows two”

I see only one rifle.

[PAR35]

The other one looks like it might be a shotgun.

[Blue Collar Christian]

“The article mentions only one rifle being found, but the photo shows two, in addition to a large quantity of ammo. I’m wondering if the photo is of the woman’s weapons, or is a stock photo from some other story having nothing to do with the woman. To me, “armed to the teeth” does not apply to ONE rifle.”

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, but not to the teeth, shall not be infringed.

[catnipman]

“whereas the initial impression is that she was some sort of armed terrorist photographing the base for some nefarious purpose. “

Indeed. I remember when the original articles about this came out, and it made it seem like she was a terrorist photographing military operations for subsequent terrorist activity. Too bad she couldn’t also successfully sue some of the media outlets that published those lies.