Posted on 12/13/2014 8:15:06 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s
Edited on 12/13/2014 6:58:29 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
CENTRAL, SC (FOX Carolina) -
A soldier returning home for the holidays to see his wife and newborn baby in Central is being kicked out of his wife's apartment after the landlord said he is overstaying the time allowed for visitors.
Sergeant William Bolt is stationed in Missouri, but his wife has been in Central. She gave birth to their daughter two weeks ago.
Bolt said the landlord at The Groves apartment complex in Central told him he had overstayed, saying visitors are not allowed to stay in the apartments past seven days, per the agreement signed by Bolt's wife, Lily. [snip]
Copyright 2014 FOX Carolina (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.
Yeah sure.
“What facts do you have? You haven’t stated any facts.
Keep trying there, someday you’ll get it.”
I have posted three links to support my position.
“On the basis that I’ve owned rental property before.”
I have owed rental property. Also stayed at a Holiday Inn.
Apparently your name is Chuck or you're a relative of that d*ck Chuck or the same kind of insensitive, uncaring, inflexible individual that would do the same thing as Chuck and make threats to a new mother and her newborn baby and her military serviceman husband at Christmastime to get your jollies off. I don't care what the lease or HUD says, the guy could cut them some slack. I don't know how long the husband wants to stay with his wife but it sounds like he has to go back to Missouri soon to report for duty and it will all be a moot question. And if Chuck still an a**hole, she should move out. And then Chuck can go play Scrooge with some other folks.
Chuck is the kind of person that make peoples' lives miserable.
Mmmmmm.....does the landlord have eyes for the soldiers wife?
” I don’t care what the lease or HUD says, the guy could cut them some slack.”
Sure he could. But think about her three roommates that did not bargain for having a family take up their common area during exam week.
The three roommates you just invented out of the blue could go to the library to study. Besides, the husband says his wife has finished her exams and they would be leaving to visit family. Problem solved for the phantom roommates.
“Husband? Why is he not on the lease? If he was, there would be no problems
with the visitor clause. There’s the fishy, it’s not the landlord.”
six month deployment. Most likely, he wasn’t there to sign in as part of the lease. This probably has more to do with the risk of making exceptions to the rules. Make an exception for one, and good luck ever being able to hold anyone to the rules.
If this was the WIFE returning I would bet the outcome would be different.
Just sayin.
“The three roommates you just invented out of the blue could go to the library to study.”
And also sleep in the library?
” Most likely, he wasn’t there to sign in as part of the lease.”
One: If he had signed, he would have had to pay his share of the per-person rent.
Two: The apartments were agreed to as same-sex apartments.
There are no roommates, so give it up.
THE GROVES CLEMSON RESPONDS TO ACCUSATIONS
We are a military family and we welcome veterans and others who follow proper procedures to stay in our community which is federal law regulated. We are an exclusive student community that takes pride in the country we live in and our veterans who serve past, present and future. We are also a business that runs by rules, regulations and contracts. It is our responsibility to provide the safest environment possible to our students/tenants. Proper procedures were explained to both the tenant and the gentleman living there recently. The particular section that applies to this couple was set aside and initialed by the tenant as part of a signed contract. As it stands right now the tenant and her guest have refused to comply with a very simple procedure. Parents, guardians and grantors respect and appreciate our guest polices for the safety of their students who choose to live in our safe community. It is our goal to provide all of our tenants the same treatment no matter what gender, race, age, school or career they are or have chosen. Safety is our ultimate goal and we can not and will not jeopardize it.
We apologize that the media has misrepresented this entire situation based solely on the statements of only one individual and made it appear to be something it is not.
The Groves Clemson
“There are no roommates, so give it up.”
Their contract says ‘roommates’.
I don’t see a contract that mentions roommates. And the response of the apartment to the accusations is only their side of the story, exactly what they are accusing the “one individual” of doing. So I don’t see this as anything different than it started out as.
“I don’t see a contract that mentions roommates.”
Roommate Policy: To secure a house two individuals must complete all leasing paperwork and pay all fees.
To secure a four-bedroom apartment, two individuals must complete all paperwork and pay all fees. Those two individuals then have one week to bring in their third roommate and then one additional week to bring in the fourth and final roommate. In the event that roommates are not brought in during this time, The
GROVES of Clemson reserves the right to place roommates into the un-leased bedrooms, relocate you to another unit, or cancel your lease. If you notify The GROVES of Clemson that you do not have roommates, we will work with you to assist you in finding roommates if at all possible.
Co-ed Policy: Coed living is allowed at The GROVES of Clemson however only same gender per floor will be allowed. Subleases must be approved by all residents and guarantors of the apartments.
THE GROVES CLEMSON RESPONDS TO ACCUSATIONS
We are a military family and we welcome veterans and others who follow proper procedures to stay in our community which is federal law regulated. We are an exclusive student community that takes pride in the country we live in and our veterans who serve past, present and future. We are also a business that runs by rules, regulations and contracts. It is our responsibility to provide the safest environment possible to our students/tenants. Proper procedures were explained to both the tenant and the gentleman living there recently. The particular section that applies to this couple was set aside and initialed by the tenant as part of a signed contract. As it stands right now the tenant and her guest have refused to comply with a very simple procedure. Parents, guardians and grantors respect and appreciate our guest polices for the safety of their students who choose to live in our safe community. It is our goal to provide all of our tenants the same treatment no matter what gender, race, age, school or career they are or have chosen. Safety is our ultimate goal and we can not and will not jeopardize it.
We apologize that the media has misrepresented this entire situation based solely on the statements of only one individual and made it appear to be something it is not.
The Groves Clemson
You’re coming up with stuff that wasn’t in the article. You’re either making it up or you’re involved in this case yourself or you’re finding more details on the internet that the rest of us don’t have the advantage of seeing. I don’t know. But you appear to have an inflated view of your own self importance. If you want to do your own research and then argue with yourself go right ahead. I’ve stated my opinions and am not interested in wasting my time with you anymore.
The enlisted rank soldier is her husband. The landlord is an elitist, anti-family, anti-American creep. I’ve met a few former members of the military, who demonstrated a generalized hatred against enlisted soldiers and families.
“You’re coming up with stuff that wasn’t in the article”
I know! It’s called research. Try it sometime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.