Posted on 12/12/2014 2:37:43 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
Yeah. I forgot that one.
She could very well be innocent also. What read of the case hinged on the credibility of the defendant and the investigator. As the [b][u]only[/b][/u] evidence against Ms. Milke was an alleged confession heard only by the investigator, this throws the conviction into doubt because of the investigator’s long history of false statements and manufactured evidence - information which was withheld by prosecutors.
They weren’t strangers. One was her roommate, and the other was a friend of his.
Motive? The roommate questioned her about her terms of employment at an insurance company, and discovered her benefits package included life insurance. He told his friend he would get $250 from the insurance payout. Scamming Mrs. Milke out of the insurance could be a strong motive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.