Skip to comments.
Ted Cruz for President?
The PJ Tatler ^
| December 11, 2014
| Michael Walsh
Posted on 12/11/2014 6:18:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
2
posted on
12/11/2014 6:20:05 PM PST
by
tomkat
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Minor v happersett.
Cruz is not eligible
3
posted on
12/11/2014 6:20:09 PM PST
by
South Dakota
(shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
4
posted on
12/11/2014 6:20:31 PM PST
by
re_nortex
(DP - that's what I like about Texas)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5
posted on
12/11/2014 6:20:36 PM PST
by
Defiant
(How does a President reverse the actions of a dictator?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ted for President.... yes please.
6
posted on
12/11/2014 6:21:05 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: South Dakota; Jim Robinson
Cruz is not eligible.Wrong and the boss makes his stance quite clear.
7
posted on
12/11/2014 6:21:35 PM PST
by
re_nortex
(DP - that's what I like about Texas)
To: South Dakota
Cruz is eligible, and will be the best president since Reagan — and just FYI, the management of FR generally discourages people from wasting bandwidth on arguing against Cruz's eligibility.
8
posted on
12/11/2014 6:23:38 PM PST
by
Wyrd bið ful aræd
(Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
To: South Dakota
Minor v happersett.
Cruz is not eligible
Minor v happersett does not define "Natural Born" to require two citizen parents at birth, also, there is nothing in the Constitution, US Law, or Supreme Court Ruling that defines "Natural Born" to require two citizens at birth, no matter how much you want to believe it.
9
posted on
12/11/2014 6:23:56 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: South Dakota
10
posted on
12/11/2014 6:25:32 PM PST
by
re_nortex
(DP - that's what I like about Texas)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“...Cruz may shoot himself in the foot in the next year and find others supplanting him among Tea Partiers and the rest of the party. But any assumptions on the part of the establishment that he will crash and burn is a huge mistake....”
*****************************************************************************************************
The first sentence is a fantasy of the GOPe RINOs and the ‘RATS. The 2nd sentence is a factual cautionary tale (from the RINO/’RAT perspective).
Let’s ALL support Ted Cruz for our 2016 nominee! Let’s not let them con us into splitting the conservative vote yet again.
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; RitaOK; MountainDad; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!
If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
12
posted on
12/11/2014 6:26:28 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
13
posted on
12/11/2014 6:26:57 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: South Dakota
After suffering through 8 years of Obama, I don’t care any more, and it is arguable he is eligible. During his first term, let’s have that convention of states, and we can fix it there, to clarify who is eligible to be President (while grandfathering current Presidents).
14
posted on
12/11/2014 6:27:00 PM PST
by
Defiant
(How does a President reverse the actions of a dictator?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wouldn't want Snyder at the top of the ballot but he might not be a bad pick for a Cruz running mate with the right marketing. Snyder is pretty liberal but tends to defer to his inner businessman with social issues. He's a strong supporter of getting the feds out of most infrastructure funding and getting it back in the hands of the states. He's manhandled Obama in every encounter.
Will Michigan Governor Snyder Ride Detroit Resurgence to the White House?
15
posted on
12/11/2014 6:29:56 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(You can't half ass conservatism.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ted for President.
I’ll vote for that, EARLY and OFTEN!!!!!!
:-)
16
posted on
12/11/2014 6:30:19 PM PST
by
EXCH54FE
(Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
To: Defiant
After suffering through 8 years of Obama, I dont care any more, and it is arguable he is eligible.
B.S.
Whether or not he is eligible is defined by the Constitution, US Laws, and/or Supreme Court rulings on the matter.
I defy you to present one instance from any of those three sources of truth that come anywhere close to defining "Natural Born" as requiring 2 US Citizens at birth.
You won't, because you can't, because it doesn't exist.
Not arguable in the least.
End of argument, period.
17
posted on
12/11/2014 6:30:46 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: re_nortex
Obviously you didn’t read what I posted.
Cruz is not eligible.
He is not a natural born citizen.
I don’t care who says he is
18
posted on
12/11/2014 6:34:52 PM PST
by
South Dakota
(shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
Cruz is eligible, and will be the best president since Reagan...That's an absolutely right analysis. As an aside, two great American Patriots named Ted -- Ted Cruz and Ted Nugent -- weren't born here in Texas. Yet both of them are more Texan in spirit than those fortunate enough to be native born such as Scott Pelley, the commie who reads "news" for See-BS, Willie Nelson, the leftist who supports murdering children and Domingo Garcia of the racist LULAC outfit.
19
posted on
12/11/2014 6:35:37 PM PST
by
re_nortex
(DP - that's what I like about Texas)
To: re_nortex
If not that, then Cruz-West!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson