Posted on 12/10/2014 9:59:01 PM PST by smoothsailing
Was Bill Cosby there?
LOL
Oooh, that’s gonna leave a mark.
She nails it.
Without the evil, rapey, white male the entire world view of the ‘social justice’ crowd falls apart.
They have to have the oppressed, so they themselves can be the Champions of the Oppressed ...
And since they need the oppressed, there has to be an oppressor.
The heterosexual white male is the pinnacle of the oppressor caricature ... the oppressor of all victim groups. If we didn’t exist they would have to invent us ...
PIV is always rape, ok?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3108209/posts
This is the Tough Love Method, but after Lena Dunham and UVA-Rolling Stone fraud, and possibly in the Bill Cosby Accusations, people are becoming more skeptical. ANy pretenders are going to ruin it for the real victims which absolutely do exist.
Apparently PIV is to ucky to spell out.
"Take Back the Night" rallies are public events. For anyone who doesn't know, they are the secular/feminist/wiccan equivalent to an evangelical revival tent meeting. Women are encouraged to go up to a microphone and talk about their rapes/tortures/harrassments by evil men. Like the Salem witch trials, no evidence is presented or asked for that any event described actually happened. This should have been Erdely's first clue that this was crap.
I never PIV’d anybody that didn’t have it coming ...
Takes two to tango.
It doesn't have to be any more complicated than that.
I knew a woman who walked around for days claiming in public (but not to the police) that a particular man had tried to rape her in a hotel room. I knew her well enough to press her for details, and they finally came out: She had gotten into an argument with the man, and had made him so angry that he pushed her away from him onto a bed. That was the entire "rape." There was nothing sexual about it at all. He had not tried to remove her clothes or to physically force himself on her.
What was her reason for lying? I think she simply craved the attention that she knew she would receive. The fact that the attempted rape never happened did not matter to her. All that mattered was getting the attention. She didn't even seem embarrassed.
“On college campuses, two millennia of Anglo-Saxon law has been scrapped in deference to sexual assault doctrines that would embarrass Chairman Mao. Young men’s futures are being put in the hands of the most closed-minded, reason-free, quick-to-accuse, unfair, standardless humans on Earth.”
I’m not always Coulter’s biggest fan, but that passage is sheer brilliance.
“Another explanation for her trauma is: Jackie is a nut. Have you considered the possibility that your protagonist is out of her mind?”
Certainly turned out to be the case with (now-convicted murderer) Crystal Magnum.
That reminds me, I need to buy string beans.
Fake but accurate. It does not matter if the story is true. Article after article is now about rape. It is simply a device to get the subject on the front page. Period.
The next step will be pushing new laws, rules, etc. based on a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.