Posted on 12/07/2014 8:12:52 PM PST by TigerClaws
Full title: Rolling Stone quietly changes apology on rape story to take full responsibility after critics accused magazine of 'victim blaming'
Rolling Stone magazine has quietly changed its botched and much-criticized apology over a damning article documenting an alleged brutal gang rape at the University of Virginia.
In the story by writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely, a junior identified only as 'Jackie' says she was repeatedly assaulted by a group of seven Phi Kappa Psi fraternity members.
But on Friday, Rolling Stone Managing Editor Will Dana apologized in a letter to readers, admitting there were discrepancies in Jackie's account about the incident and saying that the magazine has now 'come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced.'
The magazine came under heavy fire for an apology that was seen as blaming the victim and throwing Jackie under the bus.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2864491/Rolling-Stone-quietly-changes-apology-rape-story-fully-blame-students-come-forward-argue-story-rings-true.html#ixzz3LHAr4UD0 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Running the story wasn't going to cause worse problems for her?
Today a Fox contributor says "Jackie" wanted to not participate in the story before it ran. Major red flag.
I hope not only RS is bankrupted financially from this but the UVA head is fired as well. She reacted without any actual proof in a pathetic way - as bad as the Duke officials years ago.
2 to 10% is the generally accepted false rate reporting average:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape
How are they taking full responsibility? Any pay cuts, demotions or firings?
They should have sticked to that.
One of their founders is a guy who left his wife for a fag several years ago.
i am sooooooooooooooo tired of this crap.
Politics seem to rule the day, now. It’s tainted everything.
But she’s NOT a victim. That’s what this is about. So now they are apologizing for their apology?
They went from saying “we relied on ‘Jackie’” to it was our fault... legally worded.
I would think any member of that frat or in recent years could sue for defamation. The implication was EVERY member had to rape a girl as part of a hazing ritual.
Turns out there weren’t even pledges at that time and there wasn’t even a party that weekend.
yep. Their relevance ceased around 1981..
Millions, fer sho.
If the myth “victims never lie” is so true why is there an Eighth Commandment?
PJ O’Rourke was the foreign-affairs desk chief at Rolling Stone (85-00).
Not true. RS ran the stories on Karen Silkwood. I was sympathetic to her at the time. But now I wonder if those fuel rods were defective because she and her friends were higher than high while building them.
Naw, they always thought they were on the cutting edge of "counter-culture" journalism. You just don't remember because, like me, you never read that crap. Sorta' like Playboy!
Perhaps victims never lie, but non-victims do it all the time.
Indeed: Victims never lie (about being victims - if they are victims).
However, non-victims sometimes lie and claim that they are victims.
Ergo: Some people who claim to be victims are true victims, and not lying, while some of them are not true victims, but are rather lying.
In other words: Investigate both sides, and get all the facts, before printing anything.
Regards,
Is that from the Constitution (King James version)?
I heard “Jackie” was in tears about this whole mess and she now thinks people don’t believe she even exists. at least that’s what her roomates bigfoot and the Loch Nesss monster told me.
CC
Does Jackie really exist except at the end of a pen from the author at Rolling Stone? Who is Jackie?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.