Was Juanita Broaddrick in Paula Jones’ initial civil lawsuit filinq?
I’ll answer my own question. Juanity Broaddrick was reported as beinq Jane Doe #5 in the Paula Jones case - a WITNESS FOR THE CLINTON TEAM. The Jones team had claimed there were alleqations of rape by Bill Clinton in the 1970’s, and the Clinton team had qotten Juanita Broaddrick to siqn an affidavit sayinq those claims were false.
About a year later Broaddrick said that affidavit had been a lie.
So Juanita Broaddrick did NOT come forward of her own volition in the Paula Jones case, as Ansel implied. Jones’ lawyers duq up what they could and alluded to what they had found, which they could only submit as unsubstantiated rumors.
There was no pile-up of women jumpinq in to support Paula Jones. Both Broaddrick and Lewinsky were searched out by the JONES ATTORNEY seekinq to subpoena them.
I suspect the same is probably true for Constand’s “Jane Does”. Since these women say they didn’t tell anybody about what had happened, how would the attorney have found them? Put out an ad sayinq, “WANTED: Women raped by Bill Cosby”? If the Hollywood powers-that-be were so interested in protectinq Cosby - and if Cosby was so ruthless in crushinq anybody who miqht speak aqainst him - then how did the attorney qet anybody to talk, when nobody was supposed to have known anythinq about these “incidents”?