The 2000 police report didn’t claim drugs were used. It was claimed that Cosby put her hand on his stomach and nudged it towards his pants but stopped when she told him to stop. Tarshis’ statement means that there was no talk about drugging or rape because of any police report.
I’m the only one in my family who has these computer issues, and my family believes the way I am hard on my computers is by doing research and not shutting up about it.
ALL of this is just a bunch of people blowing on about their opinions. The one piece of actual evidence was Dickinson’s claimed photos, but they instead reveal big problems with her claims and with the claim that nobody collaborated on bringing forward false charges.
When the rule is “innocent until proven guilty”, the person who makes the positive claim (and thus would have any evidence that could be produced) is responsible to produce it. If Dickinson says her manuscript was censored then she should bring forward the original draft and the letters telling how it would be edited. Regardless of whether her claim of rape was in the manuscript, though, the fact remains that she said in the book that Cosby blew her off because she wouldn’t sleep with him, and now she claims that she DID sleep with him (unwillingly). Either she was lying then or she is lying now, or both.
Why is the media totally silent on that?
2000 report omits drugs
— so big (redacted) what. it establishes the first official time that cosby is officially on the criminal defensive in public. i emphasize in public only because there may have been prior contacts with LE by alleged victims which did not result in any released police reports or other publicly available LE records, but still potentially exist and await formal entry into the public record via discovery, independent affidavits, interviews, etc.
— research can be very, very hard on computers. i do research on computers. i know. don’t beat yourself up about it. hope your family will eventually at least understand if not accept.
opinion blowing
— no it’s not just strictly all about people blowing there opinions. exhibit #1 - buckhead (the one and only)
dickinson photos, dickinson photos, dickinson photos (bleah)
— relatively unimportant, relatively unimportant, relatively unimportant. see one of my first responses to your dickinson posts. did you ever take a debate course? ever? ever? buehler? buehler?
innocent until proven guilty
— we are not here parties to any lynch mob to my knowledge. i’ve stated early on that everyone alive is constantly called upon to make decisions in real time based on realtime and imperfect data streams. in addition, there is the challenge of the general issues involved such as power inequity resulting in the potential for rape to go unpunished in the la culture, the showbiz culture, and beyond. with all due respect, some folks aim is intellectually on the low side in their arguments. they go down ratholes and every attempt to help them extricate them is met with resistance and digging in deeper. hello.
why media silent
— with all due respect, who gives a (redacted redacted). this is not the media. we’re fr.
:-)