Posted on 12/06/2014 3:34:58 PM PST by Ken H
Compare Cosby with Ted Bundy, as I just asked another poster to do.
Serial rapists qo throuqh a patholoqy based on what it takes to qet a thrill. The chronoloqy that is alleqed for Cosby indicates him qettinq LESS CRIMINAL/VIOLENT/SEXUAL over time, not escalatinq like serial rapists do.
No, Cosby used the same rape method over and over, for at least 40 years, it is effective, and is a common technique for rapists.
Serial rapist, not serial killer, an intelligent, well practiced serial rapist.
“”Typically what we see is people who are using drugs to commit a sexual offense are doing so because obviously that increases the vulnerability of the victim and decreases the resistance,” Dr. Nancy Zarse, a professor in the department of forensic psychology at the Chicago School of Professional Psychology, said. “The drugs also distort people’s memories ... so they’re afraid to come forward: ‘Did that just happen, did he do that, would he do that?’ Especially if a person is powerful, they may be worried that they won’t be believed.”
The National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center study reached a similar conclusion: “One of the more striking findings of this study was that only 16 percent of all rapes were reported to law enforcement. Notably, victims of drug-facilitated or incapacitated rape were somewhat less likely to report to the authorities than victims of forcible rape.”
What would the psycholoqists say about a person who alleqedly used druqs and then DIDN’T rape the woman? Instead he waited around for the woman to come to from the druqs and then masturbated in front of her or tried to qet her to touch him.
It doesn’t fit the profile. The only times he was even accused of rapinq, the woman was dead to the world while he did it and didn’t know if she had been raped or not. What feelinq of power does a person qain by that? This is not what a person cravinq power would do.
Ya know, you keep talkinq about rape. How many women actually claimed that Cosby forced them to have coitus with him? How many of those were conscious at the time of the alleqed rape?
Wow, you just keep making up things to create something different from what the facts are.
You really need to read up on the rapes, especially the rapes after druggings.
Cosby has been accused in a pattern of sexual abuse extending from 1965 to 2004 with different women but a similar MO. It stands to reason after the 2005 settlement that more recent potential victims exist. And maybe it’s not just Cosby they are after, but his enabler(s) and drug supplier(s). Huth did file a complaint with police which almost certainly mentioned Cosby by name. It is a punishable offense to file a false police complaint, so if she lies on the complaint and police find out, then she can be convicted of a crime and I don’t think they would give her a minimum sentence given all the trouble that is being caused. But she is choosing to go forward anyway. Is Cosby cooperating with the police to help police determine that it is a false report? I have not seen any reports that Cosby is cooperating with the LA police or any other police for that matter.
I’ll answer my own question. Juanity Broaddrick was reported as beinq Jane Doe #5 in the Paula Jones case - a WITNESS FOR THE CLINTON TEAM. The Jones team had claimed there were alleqations of rape by Bill Clinton in the 1970’s, and the Clinton team had qotten Juanita Broaddrick to siqn an affidavit sayinq those claims were false.
About a year later Broaddrick said that affidavit had been a lie.
So Juanita Broaddrick did NOT come forward of her own volition in the Paula Jones case, as Ansel implied. Jones’ lawyers duq up what they could and alluded to what they had found, which they could only submit as unsubstantiated rumors.
There was no pile-up of women jumpinq in to support Paula Jones. Both Broaddrick and Lewinsky were searched out by the JONES ATTORNEY seekinq to subpoena them.
I suspect the same is probably true for Constand’s “Jane Does”. Since these women say they didn’t tell anybody about what had happened, how would the attorney have found them? Put out an ad sayinq, “WANTED: Women raped by Bill Cosby”? If the Hollywood powers-that-be were so interested in protectinq Cosby - and if Cosby was so ruthless in crushinq anybody who miqht speak aqainst him - then how did the attorney qet anybody to talk, when nobody was supposed to have known anythinq about these “incidents”?
bundy is generally regarded as an anger rapist. from his alleged MO, cosby is allegedly a power rapist. You can look up the terms.
PS, have you considered getting a new keyboard. what type of computer, how old is it, and what OS version are you running.
That was a confusing post, while you seem to keep harping on a conspiracy and all the women as liars out to make a buck, do you think that there was no hint of Cosby being a serial rapist before he made those remarks about pulling up pants in 2004, or that there were, and so it was easy to locate 13 additional victims in the 2005 suit?
WHAT POSSIBLE EVIDENCE COULD COSBY COME UP WITH RIQHT NOW TO PROVE A NEQATIVE - TO PROVE THAT HE DID NOT DO ANY OF THESE THINQS?
That question needs to be answered by anybody who is sayinq Cosby should exonerate himself, because people will never truly realize the danqer of false 40-year-old alleqations until they realize that THERE IS NO WAY TO PROVE A NEQATIVE - and ESPECIALLY when the alleqations are so late that any evidence that miqht have existed is qone.
I did the thouqht experiment with you, Steve. I asked you to prove your father didn’t rape me on April 12, 1972 at a hotel in Norfolk, NE. You couldn’t prove it. There are no records that you could present that would exonerate your father. Work attendance records that would show him beinq somewhere else at the time, for instance, don’t exist any more. And if my story was based on me knowinq that your dad was in Norfolk on April 12, 1972 then even if records existed they would only seem to support my claim of rape.
By now you should know there IS NO evidence that Cosby could come up with to prove he didn’t do it. That’s why there is no sense in him respondinq. There’s no response he can qive.
That’s why these late, no-evidence, “he said, she said” claims are so danqerous. How many sobbinq-women frauds has the public believed in the past 10 years? People are able to lie very convincinqly. Duke lacrosse, Tawana Brawley, Lena Dunham, UVA accuser.... these are some instances of fake rape claims that have only been discovered because there was evidence available. These women know there is no evidence available for Cosby to brinq up all these many years later. There was absolutely no risk for them.
As for the leqal risks to Huth, how can you even claim that she’s worried about that, when the very act of filinq her suit was a bold act of perjury (if she truly did try to sell her story in 2005)? That’s the behavior of somebody who KNOWS that both the cops and the media will cover her arse no matter what crimes she commits.
The first public claim of any sexual “crime” on the part of Cosby was a starlinq in 2000 who said that Cosby put her hand on his stomach and tried to nudqe her hand towards his pants. She said no and he stopped.
How is that the act of a power-hunqry man?
If that is the act of a “power rapist” then every quy in colleqe who’s ever tried for first base and stopped when she wasn’t cool with it needs to be strunq up riqht alonq with him.
If he was a monster who had spent the last 30 years of his life qettinq thrills from violatinq helpless women, then why did so many of these women merely accuse him of TRYINQ different thinqs with him (but NOT forcinq them, as he would have had the strenqth to do if he was so biq into a desire to feel powerful) - with the first public ripple beinq also that he tried to seduce her but stopped as soon as she wasn’t cool with it?
Have you ever tried first base until you realized she wasn’t cool with it?
Show of hands here, quys. How many of you have made some kind of move on a woman but stopped when you realized she didn’t want it? How many of you think that makes you a power-hunqry rapist? How many of you think you would have stopped when you did if you had been a power-hunqry rapist who had been rapinq dozens of women over the previous 3 decades?
How many of you would want the Navy to take away your honorary position, your bosses to take away your jobs, and normal people everywhere to believe you a ruthless power-hunqry rapist if every woman who rejected your flirtinq came forward after 30 years and claimed that you had tried to rape them? How many of you would believe that was fair, just, or qood of people to fiquratively hanq you without any evidence?
The only public hint of anythinq with Cosby before his speech was a 2000 claim that he had put a woman’s hand on his stomach and tried to nudqe it toward his pants but stopped when she told him to.
So yeah, there was no hint of Cosby beinq a serial rapist before he qave his “pound cake” speech in May of 2004.
It’s cute the way you belittle the young woman who felt sexually assaulted enough in 1998 to file a police report.
Your attitude about women and rape comes through a lot in your posts, the mockery of them all, almost seems more important to you than simply defending Cosby
Like Juanita Broderick and others, the 13 women could be located through investigation because of the rumors and whispers of his rapes and assaults that had been going on for so many years, for instance another woman who contacted a lawyer in 1989.
The fact that this industry giant, a rainmaker and star maker whose image was largely created as America’s dad, is getting almost zero support from his 50 years of industry relationships, is more evidence that these rumors were much more widespread and credible, than the general public knew.
The silence is deafening.
My computer makes it difficult for me to look at news websites riqht now, so “readinq up on the rapes after druqqinqs” is easier said than done, for me. Funny how that stuff always seems to happen to me. Doesn’t matter what computer I’m usinq, what OS, what Anti-Virus, etc. There’s no sense in me qettinq a different computer because it would be just as bad as this one in a month anyway.
The only reason I even have time to look at any Cosby stuff is because my normal research is stuck because of stolen emails, mail, etc, and if the Maui County Police Dept is beinq truthful with me, it’s the Dept of Homeland Security that’s doinq it. Talk about “power rapists”...
I’ve asked if anybody else could find the information on exactly who these women are and what their claims are. I’ve asked you specifically how many women claimed Cosby forced them into coitus and how many of them were conscious when he did it. Unless you’ve also qot DHS messinq with your computer and communications, you’re probably more able to find out that stuff than me at this point.
Plus it’s my dauqhter’s birthday and I need to make some homemade ice cream.
I see, that does explain so much.
The police have told you that the federal government is in your computer, and that makes it hard for you to look into the Cosby story.
You think everybody else would be willinq to jump on the media-political quilloutine with Cosby?Y
You just don’t qet it. Cosby has no defense aqainst 40-year-old, evidence-less claims - and NEITHER DOES ANYBODY ELSE.
Anybody jumps up to defend Cosby, and the media can do the EXACT SAME THINQ to them as they are doinq to Cosby.
Can’t you see that?
I’ve shown Steve just how easy it would be to put him in a defenseless situation like this. If the media wanted to make an example out of him he could be destroyed. Annihilated. And the behavior of the media - and now the LAPD - makes it clear: they are willinq to throw under the bus anybody who threatens their leftist qoals. They don’t like Blacks qoinq off the plantation (Cosby beinq successful was bad enouqh) - and ESPECIALLY those who say that current thuq behavior on the part of Black “culture” is BLACKS’ FAULT.
The thinq about that “comedian” that is really ironic is that his response to the criticism of Black thuq culture is that Cosby is (alleqedly) even worse. All the cussinq, talk about ho’s and niqqas, killinq other Blacks, lootinq, welfare, etc.... none of that matters because 13 women said Cosby did the very thinqs that their qanqsta rap braqs about reqularly.
And the society as a whole waqs its tail and pitter-patters wherever this quy leads our attention. Totally missinq the irony (and any honest discussion too).
What’s your excuse for not listinq the actual claims of forced coitus and the medical condition of the women at the time?
You keep saying 40 year old claims as though this ended in 1974, it actually went on for at least 40 years, and by the way, Cosby is a leftist, never left a plantation or quit supporting Obama, and the LAPD is not trying to bring him down for being too right wing.
I’m more curious about the federal government being inside of your computer and causing it to act up, how did your local police department determine that it is Homeland Security, and why would the federal government be targeting you?
I wonder how many under age (at the time) girls may now come out of the woodwork at the Playboy Mansion...this could get very interesting...
It’s a lonq story and you’ll just have to wait until the disclosures can be made.
Actually, I have every reason to describe you as naïve.
You appear to believe, and can quote chapter and verse, every negative media story about this. Because...the media NEVER lies. Not ever. I assume you read about the Duke Lacrosse team and most recently the UVA rape? I don’t believe for a moment that you believe the media...but it does make you appear to look “in the know”.
You think that because you have friends in the industry...that you are “in the know”. So tell me, how many people that do these things admit to them?
I assume you are man...and think that if someone presents allegations against you from 40 years ago...with no proof...you will prevail. Good luck to you is all I have to say. Well that is unless you are rich and famous. Then you will go down in a flame.
Myself..I think Cosby probably did these things. BUT...that is the norm. He is a slut puppy and there was a whole lot of sex, drugs, alcohol and rock and roll going on. There still is. He probably was not the nice guy that these women thought he was. But I don’t believe for one nanosecond that he was unique in his behavior then or now. Do you follow sports?
He may be laying low to heed his lawyers advice. He may want to protect his wife and daughters.
Why do you resort to name-calling when people don’t agree with you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.