Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

Obama blew it when he decided to be a “black” president or man.

A far better approach would have been for him to define himself as both black and white, rising above the artificial distinction as irrelevant. Instead, by choosing his black ancestry as definitive, rejecting and denying his white ancestry, he actually made the divide more important, not less.

This is especially so because he was essentially raised as “white,” in white culture, not black. By his actions he demonstrated that one-half of his race and ancestry was, and should be, more important and definitive of him than the other half and his upbringing combined. Just as the Nazis and KKK have always said.

All very sad.


8 posted on 12/06/2014 7:19:28 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

I would not call red (Marxist) culture “white culture”. It came about as reactionary towards traditional white culture, albeit with the intent to create its own form of feudalism.


10 posted on 12/06/2014 7:21:51 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

You live by the lie; you DIE by the lie.

It is really that simple; after all is anything, ANY SINGLE THING about our Barry the truth??

ANYTHING??


13 posted on 12/06/2014 7:25:05 AM PST by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Obama may have been raised by whites, but he wasn’t raised as a “white”. Things like work and education are alien to him, and in the end I suspect he gravitated towards blacks because they were the only ones listening. The teleprompter exposed his inadequacy early on, so most people around him simply went directly to the “power behind the throne” - whoever was typing the material for the teleprompter.


50 posted on 12/06/2014 9:55:19 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
Obama blew it when he decided to be a “black” president or man.

A far better approach would have been for him to define himself as both black and white, rising above the artificial distinction as irrelevant. Instead, by choosing his black ancestry as definitive, rejecting and denying his white ancestry, he actually made the divide more important, not less.

That would have made him less popular in the Black community. As a Democrat, he'd still carry the group, but there'd be more ill feeling if it were felt that his identification was less than complete and his loyalties divided.

This is especially so because he was essentially raised as “white,” in white culture, not black. By his actions he demonstrated that one-half of his race and ancestry was, and should be, more important and definitive of him than the other half and his upbringing combined. Just as the Nazis and KKK have always said.

They'd say it was inevitable and biological, but it was a choice, like the choices other people make in life. But I don't think it's so much a matter of defining oneself. It was more a question of not plunging into divisive issues and promoting larger causes that get away from racial divides. That he didn't do.

68 posted on 12/06/2014 12:56:37 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson