Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/04/2014 6:59:56 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hojczyk

The great Marxist power grab in Washington continues.


2 posted on 12/04/2014 7:07:34 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Old habits die hard.


3 posted on 12/04/2014 7:08:10 PM PST by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

The boy king queer in charge is attempting to copy Russia’s Siberian wastelands, and i might ‘project’, possibly place the first American Gulag within it!


7 posted on 12/04/2014 8:55:27 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Not that the Feddies care.


8 posted on 12/04/2014 9:58:02 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; All

Is the federal government going to pay for this land as required by the Constitution’s Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I and / or the eminent domain provision of the 5th Amendment?

Note that if this land is being taken for the purposes described in Clause 17 mentioned above that not only must state lawmakers approve of the sale of state land, but also consider this. If state legislatures still controlled the Senate as they did before the 17th Amendment was ratified, then I think that senators whose states are really not willing to sell any land to the feds would vote against the bill. So this land grab may be another example of major problems with the 17th Amendment.

Also, although I have nothing to substantiate the following concern, I understand that there may be bribes of state officials by the corrupt feds to support the land grabs. If such is the case then I wouldn’t be surprised if Constitution-ignorant state officials are clueless that they may be in contempt of the constitutional statutes mentioned above.


9 posted on 12/04/2014 10:54:43 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; All
How much you wanta bet, this outrage includes lands in the Bundy Ranch
(B@$t@rd Reids') attempted Nevada land grab for his son's CiCom fiends.

10 posted on 12/04/2014 11:07:42 PM PST by skinkinthegrass ("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Sheez. Why doesn't the NPS just play with the land it already has? Think of the millions of empty acres they currently possess and are doing nothing with, and here they are reaching for more!

Needy baby greedy baby.

11 posted on 12/05/2014 12:25:04 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I LOVE THIS GUY!! I don’t know if he’s self-aggrandizing, but if he is, he’s doing it with stone truth.


12 posted on 12/05/2014 12:44:06 AM PST by jagusafr (the American Trinity (Liberty, In G0D We Trust, E Pluribus Unum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

The ultimate goal is 50% of the land in “Core Wilderness Areas with little to no human use” as per The Wildlands Project.

takingliberty.us


14 posted on 12/05/2014 6:34:23 AM PST by Captain7seas (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson