Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Chinese Navy’s Fleet Will Outnumber U.S. by 2020
Defense Tech ^ | 12/03/2014 | KRIS OSBORN

Posted on 12/03/2014 5:04:19 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

China has plans to grow its navy to 351 ships by 2020 as the Chinese continue to develop their military’s ability to strike global targets, according to a new report.

The 2014 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission recommended to Congress the U.S. Navy respond by building more ships and increase its presence in the Pacific region – a strategy they U.S. military has already started.

The commission asked Congress to increase its Pacific fleet up to 67 ships and rebalance homeports such that 60-percent of the force is based in the region by 2020.

The commissions’ recommendations, which are based on Congressional testimony, expert assessments and open-source information on China’s military and U.S.-Chinese relations, are consistent with Pentagon’s stated plans for the region.

The Navy’s intended Pacific rebalance is designed to station 60-percent of the fleet in the area, rotate more ships and sailors through Pacific ports and move Marine Corps units through Darwin, Australia. Part of the Navy’s Pacific rebalance strategy includes plans to rotate up to four Littoral Combat Ships through Singapore, among other things.

Defense analysts have questioned where the U.S. Navy has the resources and funding to expand its presence in the Pacific adequately enough to meet the emerging Chinese threat. Critics point to the sweeping sequestration cuts as an example of the budgetary challenges that U.S. Navy officials face.

Opponents to this strategy point out that the U.S. has 11 aircraft carriers, the Chinese have one. And that one carrier still lacks an aircraft wing capable of operating off a carrier deck.

The commission cites a platforms and weapons systems the Chinese are developing, which change the strategic calculus regarding how U.S. carriers and surface ships might need to operate in the region. The report mentions the Chinese DF-21D, a precision-guided, land-launched anti-ship ballistic missile designed to reach surface targets at ranges greater than 900 nautical miles.

“China is pursuing a missile-centric strategy with the purpose of holding U.S. aircraft carriers at high risk if they operate in China’s near seas and thereby hinder their access to those waters in the event of a crisis. Given China’s growing navy and the U.S. Navy’s planned decline in the size of its fleet, the balance of power and presence in the region is shifting in China’s favor,” the commission states.

While the commission says the exact amount of Chinese military spending is difficult to identify, China’s projected defense spending for 2014 is cited at $131 billion, approximately 12.2 percent greater than 2013. This figure is about the sixth of what the U.S. spends annually.

The Chinese defense budget has increased by double digits since 1989, the commission states resulting in annual defense spending doubling since 2008, according to the report.

Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Virginia, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee, cited the increase in submarine and surface navy patrols tripling since 2007 as an area of concern.

“What they are doing with patrols is just the tip of the iceberg. It is not just the number of the ships, but within five to eight years they will have about 82 submarines in the Asia Pacific area and we will have about 32 to 34,” he said.

“If you look at where we are today, they outnumber us about 60 to 32 in subs. If you look at their surface ships they can get us further out with their anti-ship missiles than we can hit them,” Forbes said.

The Chinese have used cyber espionage of the U.S. military to boost their weapons development programs, the report said. In particular, the review cited a 2012 Defense Science Board report which explains how Chinese cyber spying resulted in their learning details on a number of U.S. systems such as the Littoral Combat Ship, F-35, FA/18, Black Hawk helicopter, Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense, Patriot and Global Hawk.

Chinese Naval Power

While Chinese naval technology may still be substantially behind current U.S. platforms, the equation could change dramatically over the next several decades because the Chinese are reportedly working on a handful of high-tech next-generation ships, weapons and naval platforms.

These include the LUYANG III, a new class of Chinese destroyer slated to enter the fleet this year. The ship is being engineered with vertically-launched, long-range anti-ship cruise missiles, the commission said. The new destroyer will carry an extended-range variant of the HHQ-9 surface-to-air missile, among other weapons, the report says.

Furthermore, the Chinese may already be beginning construction on several of their own indigenous aircraft carriers. China currently has one carrier, the Ukranian-built Liaoning. It is not expected to have an operational carrier air wing until at least 2016, according to the report.

The Chinese are currently testing and developing a new, carrier-based fighter aircraft called the J-15.

Regarding amphibious assault ships, the Chinese are planning to add several more YUZHAO LPDs, amphibs which can carry 800 troops, four helicopters and up to 20 armored vehicles, the report said. The Chinese are also working on development of a new Type 055 cruiser equipped with land-attack missiles, lasers and rail-gun weapons, according to the review.

“They are becoming a blue-water Navy,” said Larry Wortzel, a commissioner tasked with helping to oversee the compilation and publication of the annual review.

China’s surface fleet is also bolstered by production of at least 60 smaller, fast-moving HOBEI-glass guided missile patrol boats and ongoing deliveries of JIANGDAO light frigates armed with naval guns, torpedoes and anti-ship cruise missiles.

The commission also says Chinese modernization plans call for a sharp increase in attack submarines, nuclear-armed submarines or SSBNs.

Chinese SSBNs are now able to patrol with nuclear-armed JL-2 missiles able to strike targets more than 4,500 nautical miles. The Chinese are currently working on a new, modernized SSBN platform as well as a long-range missile, the JL-3, the commission says.

The commission also specifically addresses areas of Chinese-Russian military developmental cooperation, saying the two countries are working on a joint deal to build new attack submarines.

“China is pursuing joint-design and production of four to six Russian advanced diesel-electric attack submarines containing Russia’s latest submarine sonar, propulsion, and quieting technology. The deal would improve the PLA Navy’s capabilities and assist China’s development of quiet submarines, thus complicating future U.S. efforts to track and counter PLA submarines,” the commission writes.

In addition, China is reportedly pursuing a new class of nuclear submarines, called the Type 095 SSGN, which could bring the country its first-ever submarine-launched, land-attack cruise missile.

Read more: http://defensetech.org/2014/12/03/report-chinese-navys-fleet-will-outnumber-u-s-by-2020/#ixzz3Kq6aCvgZ Defense.org


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; iraq; pla; plan; russia; usn

Fan art of the Type-055 (courtesy Freeper Jeff Head)

1 posted on 12/03/2014 5:04:19 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Remind China that the US has over 2000 fighters at present.

China's entire air force includes about 3000 planes.

2 posted on 12/03/2014 5:14:27 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks for posting this I’ve been very concerned about China’s rise for quite sometime.


3 posted on 12/03/2014 5:19:06 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Daniel 2 Daniel 7 Revelation 13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
More 'benefits' from offshoring our manufacturing base to our chief rival. "Free Traitors" and our "Captains of Industry" will be hung from lamp posts one day..

Free trade has proven to the world we are not a serious power anymore. No country in their "right mind" does the things we do.

4 posted on 12/03/2014 5:25:22 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Thanks to the Clintoon traitors...
5 posted on 12/03/2014 5:32:55 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Less Than 3.3K To Go And The Freepathon Is Over!


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

6 posted on 12/03/2014 5:38:22 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“As society ages faster than expected, China’s future demographics need to be reassessed. Sustained low fertility means that the number of young workers will decline more sharply than projected. In 2010, there were 116m people aged 20 to 24; by 2020, the number will fall by 20% to 94m. But the actual number of workers will be considerably lower than 94m, thanks to rising participation in higher education. Annual higher-educa­tion enrollments tripled from 2.2m to 6.6m in 2001-10, while the number of college students (mostly aged 18 to 21) rose from 5.6m to 22.3m. Declining fertility levels reduced the availability of young workers, but this was exacerbated by the expansion of higher education. Sustained low fertility and rising college enrollments mean that the supply of young workers will continue to decline beyond 2020. The size of the young population aged 20-24 will only be 67m by 2030, less than 60% of the figure in 2010.

“As the share of young people falls and the share of elderly people rises, Chinese society will age rapidly. China already has 180m people aged over 60, and this is set to reach around 240m by 2020 and 360m by 2030. These are minimum numbers, which will only increase with rising life expectancy. Less certain are how fertility rates will affect the population age structure. Should China’s currently low fertility of 1.4 children per couple be sustained, the population share of people aged over 60 could reach 20% by 2020 and 27% by 2030. Using the more conservative inter­national definition of elderly—people aged 65 plus—one in five Chinese citizens will be elderly by 2030.”


7 posted on 12/03/2014 5:39:57 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Chinese PLA Submarine Database (note: about 1-1/2 years out of date)

http://strategicstudyindia.blogspot.com/2013/07/chinese-pla-submarine-database.html


8 posted on 12/03/2014 5:45:31 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade

It’s important that Walmart not be undermined as so many libs want to do. As it’s one of China’s best customers, it may delay China in attacking the US.


9 posted on 12/03/2014 6:01:18 AM PST by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The report mentions the Chinese DF-21D, a precision-guided, land-launched anti-ship ballistic missile designed to reach surface targets at ranges greater than 900 nautical miles.

This system, by nature, requires outside guidance to hit the target. They would only be effective in a Pearl Harbor-like surprise attack on battle groups within that range. Once hostilities began, satellite and land based support elements would be immediately destroyed.

10 posted on 12/03/2014 6:20:11 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What’s scary about this is not that China could produce 300 ships by 2020.

What’s scary is that they could produce 2500 ships by 2023.


11 posted on 12/03/2014 6:28:35 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Can't say we weren't warned.


12 posted on 12/03/2014 6:29:22 AM PST by McGruff (If you like your current Democracy you can keep it. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
As it’s one of China’s best customers, it may delay China in attacking the US.

Dream on.

When it's time for the peasants to eat grass in order to assure victory, then, by God, they'll eat grass.

13 posted on 12/03/2014 6:29:59 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Bill Gertz is the modern day Dan Smoot a true national treasure.


14 posted on 12/03/2014 6:36:06 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Daniel 2 Daniel 7 Revelation 13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade

After almost a 100 years China gets it’s First Aircraft Carrier , WOOT !!,LOL


15 posted on 12/03/2014 7:37:04 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: molson209

I use to think it was funny but now I am not so sure.


16 posted on 12/03/2014 8:43:35 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Daniel 2 Daniel 7 Revelation 13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

China has many enemies all around. Their navy would be sunk pretty quick as those countries would help the USA if needed.


17 posted on 12/03/2014 9:11:14 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

~China has many enemies all around. Their navy would be sunk pretty quick as those countries would help the USA if needed.~

LOL. You need to be really ignorant in history to think this way.


18 posted on 12/03/2014 6:27:39 PM PST by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

I agree with you. But Only if the U.S. played its cards right especially in South East Asia or Asia Pacific region.


19 posted on 12/04/2014 3:02:48 AM PST by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: odds

Looking at a map of the area you can see how Japan thru India hems in China. Their ships would be destroyed in any big war.


20 posted on 12/04/2014 9:13:23 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson