Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillyBoy; sickoflibs; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; AuH2ORepublican
The headline to this article has already answered that question.

No it didn't - but post #192 did

289 posted on 12/03/2014 12:54:16 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj
RE:”The headline to this article has already answered that question.
......
No it didn't - but post #192 did”

A number of years back some libertarians here started liking me because I was so critical of GWB’s war policies but when I would post that Ron Paul's ideas on legalizing crack and crystal meth then offering them free treatment when they get addicted was stupid, they would freak out. Paul nuts would get enraged.

Similarly some so-cons would go nuts when I said that abortion laws belong at the state level like with murder.

Some are just so one issue nuts.

290 posted on 12/03/2014 4:42:41 PM PST by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson