Posted on 11/27/2014 6:42:56 AM PST by Cheerio
Former Massachusetts Governor and failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney believes Republicans should "swallow hard" and pass a permanent amnesty bill in the wake of President Barack Obama's executive amnesty that even Romney conceded would encourage more illegal immigrants to enter the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Think it more the case; that we would have had a more sane policy. ..yes; like follow the laws already in place - for starters - and secure border. Somehow, doubt too; that Ebola would be the political ' opportunity' that Obama has made of it - and with predictable disastrous consequences. (Maybe too; the Ebola 'unfolding' is Alynsky in action?)
Had we a Repub President. . .there would not have been a 'Benghazi';and certainly not, Ferguson. And we would not own, the worst boondoggle of 'health care'. And too; and not 'least'; our Military would still be in tact rather than in 'tatters'. And 'totalitarians' of whatever 'ism', would not be running our schools from Obama's 'Czardom', of Dept. of Education.
WhatEVER the case; we have one ugly 'turning of America'. . .and think only those who are America-hating, totalitarian Leftists (a redundancy here), suffering Classic Marxist Personality Disorder, are capable of so much destruction of a nation, good and great; while taking so much pleasure by it all. (Add a 'Muslim Complex'...and destruction factors.)
Are their serious issues with Mitt? Absolutely; both he and Jeb, (Boehner/McConnell) seem to suffer from same 'Party Muse'. If Establishment wins. . .and so likely that; we need to ask, if the 'fault is in their 'stars' of are they actually, fixable. (Much depends on 'good Repubs in Congress. ..)
OTOH. . .had we won the Presidency; we may not, now have House and Senate (Did Repub hierarchy sacrifice America for 'that' plan?). Too early to see our success; but our Establishment Repubs hardly instill confidence - and thus far; no evidence that we should be.)
Of course; there IS absolutely power - and celebration - in numbers; and we need to continue to allow good Repubs to succeed. . .because they will eventually; outnumber those who are 'less than'.
Good advice; include here 'any Office'. . .no Dems, period; and that includes 'Office' of 'Mosquito Control' as well.
“How do you deport 15 million people? One at a time...does not matter how long it takes...”
If they go Greyhound at 49 passengers a pop, it works out to slightly more than 300,000 trips. Could be done in less time than the Kenyan fraud has been in office.
We might want to charter 2 or 3 of them thar buses...
Think too; ignorance an easier word for mindless, shallow thinking Repubs. ..whereas 'evil' simply fits, those whose day begins with the thought, 'how can I maximize' my efforts to usurp the 'Freedom' - the inalienable Rights - of any/all citizens/individuals who still are enjoying and benefitting from such 'privelege'. ..
Now Romney is stealing Bill Clinton lines.
” Now you know why I didn’t bother to vote for Romney in 2012.
He would have done the same thing as Obama.”
Romney would have done it immediately.
Screw You, Mitt R0mney.
See the articles about how Boehner is annoyed with The Won about his monomaniacal ukase on immigration? Because it makes it harder for the Chamber types (like Boner) to "work with" the _Resident and "reach across the aisle" to grasp the cold, clammy hands of Red Nancy and Hairy Reid.
In short, Boner wants amnesty, covered up with fig leaves. But Barky the sometime Rent-Boy wants to shove it down Boner's throat in Macy's storefront window instead.
Cheap theater, if you can stand the dramatis personae of diseased personalities and the constant distraction of green eyes glowing in the dark.
FU Romney
How do you know?!
That Amnesty is as much a Chamber wet dream as it is the Rats' ..... and as for Mittens getting crossways with the Chamber, hell, he is the Chamber! He chairs their secret-handshake meetings and goes to the Build-a-Burger lodge hideouts.
Mittens is your ultimate NWO billionaire Suit first and foremost, and a Republican for convenience. And camouflage.
Let's say you DID vote "against" Obama. The act necessarily entailed voting for something else. Exactly -- what was it that you voted for when you voted "against" Obama? You cannot do one without doing the other.
Good moral righteous Christians were ELOQUENT in describing what they were voting "against" when they voted for Romney in 2012. They none of them, not a single one, were capable of owning up to what they were voting FOR in order to vote "against" Obama.
Voting "against" is chasing unicorns.
There. I fixed it for you. Robert, I don't know how long you've been voting Republican straight ticket, but I did it for about 35 years, up until 2012. In other words, I've already tried your approach, and honestly, I see NOW that what I used to do, and what you are still doing, is the real "cutting off their noses to spite their face."
It only took me 30 years to figure out that my approach then -- and your approach still -- is the fulfillment of Einstein's definition of insanity.
I hope you figure it out soon and start voting to WEAKEN leftists/statists regardless of their party affiliation. ONLY then will things start to turn around. As long as you are willing to vote for Republicans like Romney, you are voting TO harm America, although your intentions may be the opposite. There is a wise old saying, however: The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Swallow hard? That advice might fly with his buddies in Massachusetts....
Has anyone seen cavuto today(DEC 1) a new poll is out with Romney in the lead. FAUX is starting their shit early. These northeast morons need to go ahead and switch parties.
Romney must be Obama’s half brother.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.