Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kelly4c

And exactly how would you stop the media from making their reports? A Constitutional amendment?


43 posted on 11/25/2014 3:03:37 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

I heard on the radio on my way home from work that it wasn’t true that Wilson didn’t know about the robbery and that it was a media falsehood. Radio guy’s words not mine. And then the whole blown orbital socket thing was’nt true. Plus the media seemed to relay accounts from witnesses that said Brown was surrendering with hands up, but now after grand jury testimony it comes out there are African-American witnesses that corroborate what Wilson said. So yeah, in a perfect world the media should be able to report on events but wait until details are fact-checked, so they can present both sides of a story before getting a segment of our society riled up and then refusing to listen to the truth when it comes out. Remember Sandy Hook and how things were so screwed up in the beginning? I’m not saying make an amendment but they should be called out and embarrassed enough to start doing more factual reporting. Easier said than done in a 24-hour news cycle though huh?


44 posted on 11/25/2014 3:33:11 AM PST by kelly4c (http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=2900389%2C41#help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson