Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds announce largest-ever competitive lease sale for offshore wind
Fuel Fix ^ | November 24, 2014 | Ryan Holeywell

Posted on 11/24/2014 11:42:10 AM PST by thackney

The federal government today announced that it will hold its largest-ever competitive lease sale for offshore wind development in January.

The feds will allow a dozen developers to bid on access to more than 742,000 acres off the coast of Massachusetts (map) starting Jan. 29, the Interior Department said Monday.

The sale would triple the amount of federal offshore acreage available for commercial-scale offshore wind development, the department said.

That area — if fully developed — could support as much as five gigawatts of commercial wind generation, enough to power more than 1.4 million homes, according to the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

“This offshore wind energy area not only has the capacity to generate enough electricity to power half the homes in Massachusetts, but it will create local jobs and a renewable and home-grown source of power,” Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said in a statement.

Ten companies have expressed interest in the lease area, according to the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

The federal government has awarded seven commercial wind energy leases off the Atlantic coast to date.

Offshore wind projects were first developed in 1991. Since then, they’ve primarily operated in Europe. The federal government has been trying to promote them here in the U.S., since more than half the country’s population lives in coastal areas, and offshore winds tend to blow more forcefully and uniformly than wind over land.

Globally, about 4.45 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity has been installed across more than 50 projects, according to the BOEM.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: energy; offshore; wind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: thackney

“I don’t see this as worse than an oil platform. I’m in favor of those.”

Well, if you can throw a directional drilling rig in there and make it look like a windmill, you might have an opportunity to make a net positive energy impact.


41 posted on 11/24/2014 1:34:49 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

This is outside state control, 12 miles and farther offshore.


42 posted on 11/24/2014 1:36:08 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thackney
This maybe true Thackney, but the irony of this are too delicious. Teddy the U-Boat Commander never wanted it, and 85% of the Federal Lands that are drill-able for real Energy are off limits because of Lear Deader and his policies and this will prolly be another donor out-reach program like the rest of the Green Fiasco's.

Beam me up Scotty no intelligent life anywhere...

43 posted on 11/24/2014 1:48:01 PM PST by taildragger (Not my Circus, Not my Monkey ( Boy does that apply to DC...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Then it must have been on the Kennedy side until they were told to move it or lose it.


44 posted on 11/24/2014 2:01:52 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It starts at 12 miles then later on moves closer to shore. Camel nose in tent.


45 posted on 11/24/2014 2:02:51 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
It starts at 12 miles then later on moves closer to shore.

Nope. The fed limit is at 12 miles, no closer. It goes out to ~40 miles.

46 posted on 11/24/2014 2:09:37 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Different Projects. The other one that Kennedy hated is still in play. That one is in State Waters. This is for Federal Waters farther away.


47 posted on 11/24/2014 2:10:48 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Offshore wind is expensive and has never made money, even in Europe.

The maintenance is a nightmare.

We tried this off the coast of DE in one the most consistently windy spots on the planet 7 miles offshore.

The numbers did not work.

Also, without a way to store the energy to release it to the grid on a steady basis, the vagaries of output play havoc on the grid operators.

You still need back-up power sources.


48 posted on 11/24/2014 2:18:33 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
You still need back-up power sources.

Agreed. Wind is essentially fuel savings for Natural Gas Turbines. You still need to build the load capacity.

49 posted on 11/24/2014 2:25:22 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That won’t work now. Since Kennedy is dead then where will all the hot air come from to spin the windmill blades?


50 posted on 11/24/2014 3:39:12 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Could be a bonanza for scrap metal pirates.


51 posted on 11/24/2014 4:54:15 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson