[BobL]

Not to brag, but my recommendation, FROM THE OUTSET, has been that NO JUDGES (and possibly no others) be confirmed, until this lawlessness is undone.

That means if there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, then the president is simply out of luck.

I’m glad Cruz has picked up on it, I was hoping that someone would.

[jazusamo]

Absolutely, leftist/communist federal judges will carry on his tyranny for decades.

[grania]

if there is a vacancy on the SC, then the president is simply out of luck

Isn't it a little surprising, even for arrogant Obama, to not have had one of the old dems on the SC resign while they still had a majority in the US Senate?

I'm wondering (hoping) Obama made a toxic miscalculation. These new US Senators ran pretty conservative. They're not in DC yet, so haven't been compromised. There are some more strong conservative voices in the HOR. There just might be a stronger voice supporting constitutional conservative discontent and it will be harder for them to traitor us.

[DanZ]

“Not to brag, but my recommendation, FROM THE OUTSET, has been that NO JUDGES (and possibly no others) be confirmed, until this lawlessness is undone.

That means if there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, then the president is simply out of luck.”

So here is the set-up -

The current Senate setup is to need ONLY 51 votes to confirm anyone and everyone other than a Supreme Court nominee.

The recently re-elected Kentucky Rino Mitch McConnell is currently undecided on whether to go back to 60 votes or keep the current 51.

The question - If Mitch keeps the 51 vote minimum how many RINOs will vote fro Holder’s replacement?

Bonus points if you name the RIONs

[Lazamataz]

Actually at this point, no more judges or appointments even if the EO's are undone.

In fact, Congress should ignore the EO and heavily fine and arrest anyone that complies with the illegal EO.