[Don Corleone]

Congress tells the directors of the departments that would implement the EO that they will be charged w/contempt of congress if they do.

Not only contempt of Congress but an actual violation of the law that they are sworn to uphold as a condition of their employment. This is particularly true for the agency heads who I believe have to take an oath as a condition of their job. Right? Not right?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Not only contempt of Congress but an actual violation of the law that they are sworn to uphold as a condition of their employment.

OK, let’s say they actually tell the directors that they’re in contempt of congress...

THEN WHAT? Who is supposed to charge them and jail them?

The attorney general right? Good luck with that.

Need I remind everyone that ERIC HOLDER, the attorney general himself has already been charged with contempt of congress.

Why is he still in office?