NOAA: Globe Sets 5th Hottest-Month Record of 2014

ABC News ^ | November 20, 2014 | By SETH BORENSTEIN AP Science Writer

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Despite a bitter U.S. cold snap, the globe is rushing hell-bent toward its warmest year on record with last month setting the fifth monthly heat record of year.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced Thursday that last month was the hottest October on record worldwide.

"It is becoming pretty clear that 2014 will end up as the warmest year on record," said Deke Arndt, climate monitoring chief for NOAA. "The remaining question is: How much?"

He said this year's heat is what scientists expect from man-made global warming. Scientists say the burning of coal, oil and gas traps heats, changing the climate.

[Ingtar]

Where on Earth is it warm? I know they are speaking average, but nothing in news stories over the last year seems to support this.

[wbill]

I totally can buy the fact that the US is not the only game in town.

But, it's a pretty big part of the overall picture, and when US temps are running below, to far-below, normal .... I don't see how global temps can be rising. Such a big chunk would depress the average, I think.

Add in the fact that, for instance, Europe and Canada are running below normal, as well, and this whole premise stinks.

Makes me wonder who has a hand in these researchers' pockets....

[MNDude]

Hey ABC! Could it be that lack of transparency is political advantageous?

Is the stupidity of Americans vital to get getting something you’d rather have than not have?

[Lazamataz]

Effing liars.

NASA just indicated that we are probably entering a Maunder Minimum, with reduced solar input and greatly reduced global temperatures.

[ilovesarah2012]

‘Long sad history of AP reporter Seth Borenstein’s woeful global warming reporting’ As part of Climate Depot’s continuing role as the ombudsman of the Fourth Estate, the below is a small sampling of the long sad history of Associated Press reporter Seth Borenstein’s woeful global warming reporting: (See also “Related Links” below for sampling of good and bad media climate reporting.) 1) AP’s Borenstein in a PANIC: ‘Obama left with little time to curb global warming’…’cooling trend illustrates how fast the world is warming’ – December 14, 2008 2) Scientists Denounce AP’s Borenstein For Hysterical Global Warming Article – December 15, 2008 3) Say it ain’t so! AP’s Borenstein Reports: ‘The Wind seems to be dying down…the cause may be global warming’ – June 10, 2009 – Excerpt: Scientist mocks wind claims: ‘How can they have more intense storms from the same effect that is lessening winds?’ 4) Two dozen prominent scientists denounce AP’s Borenstein’s article promoting sea level fears in the year 2100 – September 24, 2007 5) AP’s Borenstein excludes scientists and peer-reviewed studies countering claims of allegedly ‘melting’ Antarctic – March 27, 2008 6) AP’s BORENSTEIN INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE’S MOVIE – June 27, 2006 7) AP’s Borenstein inaccurately described scientist as “one of the few remaining scientists skeptical of the global warming harm caused by industries that burn fossil fuels’ – July 27, 2006 8) Kudos to AP’s Seth Borenstein for writing the most balanced of all the media’s articles about this new Antarctic study – January 21, 2009 9) Arctic Scare! AP’s Borenstein out of control (again) – Warns of ‘Tipping Point’ – Quotes James Hansen, Bob Corell & a Greenpeace ‘scientist’ – August 28, 2008 – Excerpt: More ominous signs Wednesday have scientists saying that a global warming “tipping point” in the Arctic seems to be happening before their eyes: Sea ice in the Arctic Ocean is at its second lowest level in about 30 years. [...] Five climate scientists, four of them specialists on the Arctic, told The Associated Press that it is fair to call what is happening in the Arctic a “tipping point.” NASA scientist James Hansen, who sounded the alarm about global warming 20 years ago before Congress, said the sea ice melt “is the best current example” of that. [...] On top of that, researchers were investigating “alarming” reports in the last few days of the release of methane from long frozen Arctic waters, possibly from the warming of the sea, said Greenpeace climate scientist Bill Hare, who was attending a climate conference in Ghana. 10) Analysis: ‘Borenstein’s AP Sea Surface Temp Article Is Misleading…Factually Incorrect…Raises Alarmism to Ridiculous Levels’ – August 21, 2009 [Marc Morano Rebuttal to AP Reporter Seth Borenstein's Shoddy and Incomplete Arctic Article – Note: Associated Press reporter Seth Borenstein pulled out all the gadgets for this comical article on Arctic sea ice dropping to 'record level'. He got to use the phrase “tipping point” , he quoted James Hansen and Greenpeace 'climate scientist' Bill Hare (Greenpeace International describes Hare as it's “Climate Policy Director”) Borenstein's citation of Bob Corell as a neutral researcher completely ignores the fact that Corell is an environmental activist who works for Teresa Heinz Kerry's The Heinz Center, (yes the same ones who gave Hansen $250,000 award before Hansen endorsed Teresa Heinz Kerry's husband John Kerry for prez in 2004) Corell was embarrassed in 2007 by a his unsupportable claims about Greenland. Corell's assertion in a September 8, 2007 UK Guardian article that earthquakes triggered by melting ice are increasing in Greenland was rebuffed by University of North Carolina's Jose Rial. Rial is a prominent climatologist/seismologist working on glacial seismic activity in Greenland. Corell's erroneous claim prompted Rial to take the unusual step of writing a letter to the UK Guardian. "I also know that there is no evidence to suggest that these quakes 'are happening far faster than ever anticipated' [as Corell claimed,"] wrote Rial in a September 13 letter. Rial criticized the newspaper for presenting a ‘falling-sky’ alarmist perspective and added that “it will take years of continued surveying to know whether anything here [in Greenland] is ‘accelerating’ towards catastrophe, as the article [featuring Corell] claims.” See: Rial’s critique of Corell here] More Borenstein: AP’s Borenstein at it again: Claims Greenland ice crack result of AGW despite reporting it is ‘normal’ – [Note: For real story on Greenland and how temperatures there have actually COOLED or stayed the same since the late 1930's and 40's before 80% of man-made CO2 was released see here: Latest Scientific Studies Refute Fears of Greenland Melt – July 2007 -] Borenstein claim: “In northern Greenland, a part of the Arctic that had seemed immune from global warming, new satellite images show a growing giant crack and an 11-square-mile chunk of ice hemorrhaging off a major glacier, scientists said Thursday.” 1) Borenstein does at least reveal a counter view of the issue in the article: Excerpt: University of Colorado professor Konrad Steffen, who returned from Greenland Wednesday and has studied the Petermann glacier in the past, said that what Box saw is not too different from what he saw in the 1990s: “The crack is not alarming… I would say it is normal.” 2) But, Borenstein, cannot let Steffen’s comment that the ice crack is “normal” go unchallenged so he plays the old “consistent with” climate change game. 3) Borenstein: “Scientists don’t like to attribute single events to global warming, but often say such events fit a pattern.” # Climate Depot’s Media Related Links: NYT and Reporter Revkin Issue ‘Correction’ – Admit ‘Error’ in Front Page Global Warming Article Touted By Gore! – May 2, 2009 All Hail the Planet! ‘Immorality of climate-change denial’: NYT’s Krugman accuses Congressmen who voted against climate bill of ‘treason against the planet!’ – June 29, 2009 ‘Desperation Time’: NYT Promotes ‘National Security’ Climate Fears – But claims are merely ‘a redux of 1970′s laughable scares about famines and resource scarcity’ – August 9, 2009 – Climate Depot’s Inconvenient Rebuttal to ‘National Security’ Climate Argument http://www.climatedepot.com/2009/08/21/Long-sad-history-of-AP-reporter-Seth-Borensteins-woeful-global-warming-reporting/

[ilovesarah2012]

Sorry it didn’t show the paragraphs but you get the idea on this guy.

[Principled]

riiiiiiiigggghhtttt....

[Mich Patriot]

My local weather this year begs to differ, bleepholes.

[Celtic Conservative]

Yeah, I’m about to scrape a couple of inches of “global warming” off of my car before I can go to the store. Buncha jerks.

CC

[SampleMan]

Its hot, extremely hot, somewhere that you aren’t.

It must be 10 billion degrees at some remote island weather post in the south Pacific.

[Ben Hecks]

I have a hunch this guy breaks wind in the bathtub then bites the bubbles.

[eggman]

NOAA also predicted November through January would be warmer than normal for the northeastern US and near normal for the mid-west and northern plains. Might have been a good bet if you only looked at the first week. Looks like a brief thaw (3-4 days) then back to the frigid temps for the rest of the month.

The brand new glaciers around Buffalo, NY will be 100 feet deep by spring at this rate.

[muskah]

October temp are up, drum roll please, 0.01 degree. There has been no change in October since 2003. That is the record broken by 0.01 degree.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/

[hawkaw]

Your post was the funnest thing I have read in a while.

[hawkaw]

What is the “bias” or “error” in the temperature readings taken? Are the instruments truly measuring to the second decimal point?

[LachlanMinnesota]

We have always been at war with East Asia...

No for your one minute of hate....

[Pollster1]

I cannot imagine how they expect anyone to believe their propaganda. I remember this month, last month, and the summer. This was an exceptionally cool year. They need to have the common sense to tell believable lies, not the whoppers that seem to be a daily media event from the Liar-in-Chief’s minions.

[GreyFriar]

Of course it might be, if you use as your standard measurements the recordings of temps in the center of cities, those heat retaining wells of concrete, brick, and steel. where official measuring points are on top if asphalt covered roofs and or next to air conditioner vents expelling the hot air from the cooling motors.

There was study of the sites of ‘official weather measuring stations’ in the USA a couple of years ago, and what I listed above is a summary of the perponderance of findings. Sites that were in the middle of fields on the edge of town, are now in the center of the city and NOAA has not had the common sense to move them to new locations where the recordings will NOT be affected by the buildings and heat sources next to them.

[GreyFriar]

Time to fire NOAA and hire Joe Bastardi and his guys at weatherbell.com

[Stosh]

So, umhh, NOAA is saying that they have collected gazillions of temperature readings, collected by untold numbers of people of varying reliability world-wide, using a whole bunch of measuring devices of uncertain calibration, and that having gathered, processed and averaged that data, they are going to attach some significance to a difference which on the Kelvin scale amounts to roughly 1 part in 30,000?

If in fact that’s what they’re claiming, they’ve forfeited any right they might have had to call themselves scientists.

And that’s assuming they haven’t fudged the data as they’ve been shown to do so many times in the past.