Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cumbo78

It takes more energy to split H2O than it yields.


9 posted on 11/19/2014 7:16:37 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Crazieman; thackney; Darksheare; lacrew; drbuzzard; robert14; 11th Commandment; The Great RJ; ...

There were reports that the US Navy was working on this two years ago as a means of self fueling ships at sea by using seawater and carbon dioxide. There have been no further reports in the intervening two years that I know of. The problem then likely was that they didn’t have a fuel source to drive the process.
http://www.gizmag.com/jet-fuel-seawater/24287/

Except nobody mentioned that the nuclear powered aircraft carriers would generate the sort of power to convert salt water and CO2 to jet fuel. It would be expensive but cheaper than transporting jet fuel over the ocean.


22 posted on 11/19/2014 7:25:09 PM PST by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

I’m pretty sure you’re right. If I recall, The byproduct of burning hydrogen is H2O. So that would mean they would create a perpetual motion machine by making energy from water, which obviously is not possible.


34 posted on 11/19/2014 8:07:11 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

“It takes more energy to split H2O than it yields”

So much for the Hydrogen powered cars. Same for ethonal.


44 posted on 11/19/2014 8:33:40 PM PST by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson