To: wagglebee; thackney
That’s why we were examining “energy content”. This should be a good indicator of how far you can travel, unless a gas vs natgas engine has a vastly different efficiency factor.
BTW, with gasoline at $3, the numbers tighten up quite a bit, at 37kBtu vs 35kBtu.
33 posted on
11/19/2014 6:33:55 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB; thackney
That’s why we were examining “energy content”. This should be a good indicator of how far you can travel, unless a gas vs natgas engine has a vastly different efficiency factor. That's the big question for me. I'm more interested in how far I can go per dollar than BTUs.
For instance, yesterday I paid $2.57 to fill up my tank and I know that I'm getting just over 25 MPG, so it will cost me about $0.10 in gas per mile. What's that cost with NG?
35 posted on
11/19/2014 6:39:30 AM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson