Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Cross

If it was, for Constitutional purposes a tax, then the bill needed to have originated in the House in order to be Constitutional.

My recollection is that it wasn’t.


12 posted on 11/19/2014 5:30:32 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker; Kozak

IIRC, The Senate took a Bill that had originated in the House, took every word out of THAT Bill, and inserted the wording for Obamacare. In that manner, the Bill has a House designation even though ‘written’ completely by the Senate. ALSO, during oral arguments, Kagan kept saying ‘why are you calling it a tax? It isn’t a tax’. Total sleaze by the power crazy Democrats in the White House, the Congress and the SCOTUS. Roberts should have stayed the course on protecting the Constitution and the country........I do wonder what the Evil Ones have on him. He sold his soul and is still the Chief Justice.


19 posted on 11/19/2014 5:40:59 AM PST by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker
If it was, for Constitutional purposes a tax, then the bill needed to have originated in the House in order to be Constitutional

Also,,,it doesn't have a severability clause......so any part found unconstitutional makes the whole thing void...

and what about the many changes to the bill that were pasted in by Obama without any voting process.

27 posted on 11/19/2014 5:54:14 AM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson