Precedent. You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Posted on 11/18/2014 7:33:01 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Future statutes cannot reverse precedent. Oh, and we certainly cannot count on Scotus to save us.
To secure freedom, the Framers’ constitution relied on opposing interests, and a senate of the states was the keystone to their unique design.
Only senators responsible to their states can disregard the lunatic obama media.
How so? The only recent precedent is the Supreme Court slapping Obama down when he claimed the Senate was in recess when it was not. I'm not aware of a decision saying that his actions contrary to law become law. In fact, that is what the upcoming Obamacare case is about.
The WaPo can’t scare the RATS because the RATS know that a president Cruz would never use Obama’s tactics.
They know that dirty, underhanded politics are a typical RAT signature.
For starters, Obamacare has been rewritten dozens of times. He is about to rewrite immigration law. Precedent.
Precedent. You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
I realize that among some of us, there is a knee-jerk reaction to oppose anything Senator McConnell may propose, however, where the filibuster is concerned, we need to give the matter more thought. The democrats are not likely to filibuster any of the president’s nominees and since the president has the veto, they don’t need to filibuster any republican legislation. For the next two years, the filibuster is the primary if not only weapon conservative members have to prevent bad legislation and bad nominees.
My goodness, if you really don’t trust Senator McConnell, don’t give him more power to determine your fate.
Look it up.
The same reason the mainstream media kept reporting that Republicans were against Obamacare because they didn't want poor people to have "healthcare". Obamacare was about "health insurance", not healthcare.
Whether it was intentional deception, or laziness, the media is at it again. Calling what Obama has vowed to do is not amnesty - it is suspending the deportation of illegals. They will still be here illegally, and therefore criminals, but the administration will simply ignore the President's constitutional duty to enforce existing laws.
It’s a nice, wishful scenario. But if there was a President Cruz (and I hope to God there is) the Dems aided by the RINOs would move to impeach!
LOL - here's one better: have Cruz tell the DOJ they will NOT prosecute people burning down major media outlets. Also, any 'journalistic groups' attempting to organized 'fire safety teams' will be investigated by the IRS...
Liberals don't understand when they mess with the protections of the Constitution they can get burned too...
No bikes less under 300cc allowed!
Works for me.
Don’t need to. I use it daily in my line of work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.