Michael Brown got immediate justice.
The cop, not so much
Oh please, the giant had his hands on a store owner he was robbing minutes before his death.
Maybe you don’t give his parents mother and father of the year if you are looking for meaning.
Proof that God has a twisted sense of humor, is this fat beastosaurass is still alive after stuffing his face with fried food and donuts for 60 years.
Race hustler Sharpton left out that it has been over 3 months since Michael Brown tried to kill officer Wilson.
Semblance means outward appearance.
Yeah, that's what we all want right? Not justice, but an appearance of it.
I’ve sat on superior court juries twice. Both were very technical cases. One involved a LOT of handcrafted art work depicting the inside of a specific person’s head.
Both of these cases lasted 4 weeks each. Why is this grand jury, which is simply trying to decide if it should go to trial at all, taking three months?
And how is Tawana Brawley. doing Al?
>>unarmed teenager Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri
Drink!
Well, Mike Brown’s attorneys just last week begged to get one more witness in, Dr. Michael Baden who did two autopsies ... one for the state, one for the family.
So that held it up.
I’m worried that Eric Holder may have had a heavy hand in making sure Wilson is indicted to some extent.
Actual response I had:
“What idiot wrote this stupi... oh... Sharpton. Of course”
So what the hell is Al the “Reverend” of? The Church of Satan?
Hey Al. what would’ve happened if Michael Brown were a white guy who tried to wrestle a gun away from a police officer? Yeah, he’d be just as dead today as your ‘gentle giant’
Usually Al, you just blather your idiotic inanities. I see this time, you’ve put them in print.
Not exactly. They already know the answer, or think they do.
And they aren't interested in justice, they want revenge and/or a win.
BTW, IMO any homicide, by anybody for any reason, should be reviewed by a jury similar to the old-time coroner's inquest, to determine if the homicide was justified or not. If not, then it goes to the grand jury to determine if there's sufficient evidence to take it to trial. This would apply to cops as well as civilians. No "departmental review" so they can piss milk on each other.
To my mind, the present system of leaving justified or not up to the secret determination of a GJ or, worse, administrative decision by an elected or appointed prosecutor, does no service to any of the parties involved.
Note what happened to Zimmerman. A prosecutor determined the homicide was justified, then that was overruled by political pressure. If a jury of the type I describe had ruled the killing was justified, in open court, it would have at least greatly reduced the perception of secret double-dealing that was behind much of the furore.
Now, now, people, be respectful of Reverend Sharpton, he’s a man of the cloth. He’s doing God’s work on Earth. /sarc
No matter what else happens, we know one thing is certain. The grand jury acted improperly. The grand jury acted too slow, it acted too fast, it allowed too many autopsies, it didn’t allow enough of them, Brown was a victim, the officer was a racist, Brown was unarmed, the officer shot him in cold blood, it’s more evidence of White racism, it’s more evidence that Blacks can’t succeed because of Whites, the government owes Blacks more money, Whites deserve to be taken down, the knock out game is pure justice...
The list goes on. ...and on and on and on and on...
Sharpton: “Misuse the grand jury, we much.”
Don’t forget that “Rev” Sharpton has the distinction of leading the only anti-Jewish pogrom in America.
No surprise he is still in the racist riot business.
Only thing I agree with is that this nonsense has been going on for far too long. The evidence isn’t there. No charges.
When I started reading the article, I decided to inquire as to who wrote it, then I saw Al “The Weasel” Sharpton as the author. I stopped reading right there.