[Maudeen]

Isn’t ‘Mark of the Beast’ a Biblical term, or reference?

If it is Biblical, why is it constantly changing, and evolving?
_________

This is a quick read. . .the Mark of the Beast isn’t changing . . . what we are witnessing is an evolution of technology which points to a type of mark that now makes more sense than in my Grandpa’s day. Young people (and even most older) don’t have a clue what the Bible says about end times. It may be sooner than we think. . .but then again. . .no one is guaranteed a next heart beat. Be prepared is the phrase of the day.

http://www.gotquestions.org/mark-beast.html

[Ted Grant]

I have always interpreted the mark of the beast on the hand and head as the acceptance (indeed, embracing) of the beast’s immorality in deed (hand) and thought (head). Metaphor.

Seems to me that folks that keep things literal are needlessly limiting their range of options when it comes to interpretation.

[Balding_Eagle]

which points to a type of mark that now makes more sense than in my Grandpa’s day.

So, todays ‘The Mark of The Beast’ is different that ‘The Mark of The Beast’ that your Grandpa had to watch for?