[Carry_Okie]

No, you are advocating for the taking of freedom where no crime has been committed although you suspect that one MIGHT be in the future.

No. In what I am saying, a crime HAS been committed. Pursuant to a pregnancy delivering such a child, AFTER having committed said acts against it, the prosecution would commence to preclude another should that person fail to do so voluntarily. It is a penalty for a crime to prevent another.

[wagglebee]

No. In what I am saying, a crime HAS been committed. Pursuant to a pregnancy delivering such a child, AFTER having committed said acts against it, the prosecution would commence to preclude another should that person fail to do so voluntarily. It is a penalty for a crime to prevent another.

Yes, and among the "crimes" for which you advocate sterilization is the POTENTIAL for a baby having certain genetic characteristics which you disapprove of or for two people whose child MIGHT have a genetic condition which some might consider undesirable.

Just curious, will there be some sort of commission that determines which traits are "undesirable"? Will they all have blonde hair and blue eyes or will some "lesser" types be thrown in for good measure?

[MrEdd]

The child committed no crime before the forced sterilization of the mother.

Carry-okie, you are as staunch an advocate for eugenics as has ever graced this forum.
I have archived this thread to my hard drive for future reference.