Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chuck Hagel: US Needs Game-Changing Military Innovation
NEWSMAX ^ | Saturday, 15 Nov 2014 10:40 PM | Unknown

Posted on 11/16/2014 5:00:14 AM PST by maddog55

Wary of a more muscular Russia and China, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Saturday the Pentagon will make a new push for fresh thinking and creative ideas about how the U.S. can keep and extend its military superiority despite tighter budgets and the wear and tear of 13 years of war.

Hagel announced a "defense innovation initiative" that he likened to historic and successful campaigns during the Cold War to offset military advantages of U.S. adversaries. He described a "game-changing" strategy to sharpen American's military edge in the face of budget impasses on Capitol Hill.

"We must change the way we innovate, operate and do business," he said in remarks prepared for a defense forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

In a memo to Pentagon leaders in which be outlined the initiative, Hagel said the U.S. must not lose its commanding edge in military technology.

"While we have been engaged in two large land-mass wars over the last 13 years, potential adversaries have been modernizing their militaries, developing and proliferating disruptive capabilities across the spectrum of conflict. This represents a clear and growing challenge to our military power," he wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
I guess the whole "Don't ask don't tell" being repealed and other LGBT and other social experiments haven't helped.
1 posted on 11/16/2014 5:00:14 AM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I just saw Chuck Hagel saying the same thing on the news. My reaction was - blah, blah, blah, redirection. How about just bombing the hell out of ISIS and killing as many Jihadists as possible. No innovation required for that.


2 posted on 11/16/2014 5:04:01 AM PST by tstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Democrats love to invest in technology - it’s much less expensive than actual hardware. But technology only wins when it is converted to real hardware, and that is were the expense comes it. In the past it has taken a Republican to make that investment.


3 posted on 11/16/2014 5:09:19 AM PST by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

The USA political elite need to revise the fundamental policy of all branches of our government to be about advancing the liberty, security, and prosperity of the American citizens, not the rest of the world.


4 posted on 11/16/2014 5:10:29 AM PST by apoliticalone (Politicians work for their own self interest and their puppeteers not average Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I have a long-standing personal rule to always point out that Hagel is an imbecile.

Game changing technology? Continue to develop and field SDI and associated laser tech.


5 posted on 11/16/2014 5:13:05 AM PST by sgtyork (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

So far, treasonous Obola and drunk Hagel
have been importing Ebola and criminal illegals,
while making up flammable boats and stupid ROE.

The game changer would be the US Military
arresting both for treason.


6 posted on 11/16/2014 5:17:41 AM PST by Diogenesis (The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Let’s start with a new SECDEF ...


7 posted on 11/16/2014 5:18:42 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Game-Changing Military Innovation?

I'VE GOT IT!!

THE SOLUTION:

==> Stop Training And Arming Muslim Jihadis And Terrorists <==


8 posted on 11/16/2014 5:18:53 AM PST by Iron Munro (DHS has the same headcount as the US Marine Corps with twice the budget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer

Technology and weaponry are fine, but to ignore the people who use it is foolhardy. Our military was always about the commitment of the men, and later, women who used the weapons. Today it’s a mirror of the racism, sexism, etc., obsessed and ill suited for leadership people in charge.


9 posted on 11/16/2014 5:19:37 AM PST by billhilly (First eligible to vote in 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

No. I don’t want zer0 to have any more military expertise than he already has to use against our allies or to help ISIS


10 posted on 11/16/2014 5:20:05 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Sopwith Camels, sabres, plentiful multicolored ribbons, pink uniforms, big hats ... all on the table as viable military game changers ... as the military budget continues its slide toward zero.


11 posted on 11/16/2014 5:24:49 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

The best and most cost effective innovation the military needs is a return to the concept of total warfare ala WWII. This nonsense that has been in place since the Korean War of fighting just long enough to affect a desired political outcome of the moment has cost too many lives and too much money resulting in no permanent changes on the ground leaving us in worse shape than we were in in the beginning.


12 posted on 11/16/2014 5:26:38 AM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL

We’ve been down that road several times since 1951...


13 posted on 11/16/2014 5:41:50 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Kicking out the queers would be a good start.


14 posted on 11/16/2014 5:44:40 AM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

why? what’s the point? every time we spend the bucks to get an edge in military technology ... WE GIVE IT AWAY!!!!

If we had kept all our advances to ourselves these past decades ... we could have ruled the ruled for 1,000 years before the rest caught up!


15 posted on 11/16/2014 5:55:05 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Looking for game-changing technology begs the question: what good is it when we will allow the Chinese to steal all the R&D at much lower cost than we spend developing and testing it?

Since we borrow Chinese funds to pay for our weapons development that they quickly copy, aren’t the Chinese in a sense just outsourcing their R&D to us? Would we be better off NOT creating new weapons for them to exploit?

Best innovation would be actual security. But this administration IS dedicated to transparency in this area.


16 posted on 11/16/2014 5:56:41 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
How about if we change our rules of engagement to allow our troops to actually fight the enemy?
17 posted on 11/16/2014 5:57:51 AM PST by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL
The best and most cost effective innovation the military needs is a return to the concept of total warfare ala WWII.

Our local police have looser rules of engagement on us than soldiers in a war zone fighting enemy troops. That is why we no longer win wars.

18 posted on 11/16/2014 5:58:18 AM PST by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SpeakerToAnimals

The first casualties should be the lawyers and political minders

Attack, attack, attack......... concern for innocents that are not innocent must be dropped


19 posted on 11/16/2014 6:01:51 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

What the US needs is leadership for its military, not the radical in the White House, Staff Sergeant Hagel and certainly not the boot licking, career first Generals running the show.


20 posted on 11/16/2014 6:06:12 AM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson