Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi Arabia outlaws ‘tempting eyes’
Metro(UK) ^ | 4 Nov 20124 | Harry Readhead

Posted on 11/15/2014 7:05:22 PM PST by TWhiteBear

A new law in Saudi Arabia banning ‘tempting eyes’ has become the latest example of female oppression in the country.

The law, which states that women with alluring eyes will be forced to wear a full veil, has been branded ‘stupid’ by dissenters and roundly criticised on social media, aina.org reports.

Sheikh Motlab al Nabet, spokesman of the Saudi Arabian Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, said they ‘had the right’ to force women to cover their face.

‘The men of the committee will interfere to force women to cover their eyes, especially the tempting ones,’ he said.

‘We have the right to do so.’

Many commentators wondered how the word ‘tempting’ would be applied. One unnamed journalist in the country suggested it referred to ‘uncovered eyes with a nice shape and makeup.’

‘Or even without makeup, if they are beautiful, the woman will be in trouble,’ they added.

Prince Naif, whose impending ascension to the Saudi throne many hoped would spell an end to this kind of draconian oppression, looks likely to be as intolerant as his father King Abdullah after suggesting that any Muslim should support the Committee’s new law.

‘The committee is supported by all sides,’ he said.

‘It should be supported because it is a pillar of Islam. If you are a Muslim, you should support the committee.’


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eyes; islam; muslim; muslimwomen; muslimworld; rop; saudi; sharia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
These guys are nutzo.
1 posted on 11/15/2014 7:05:22 PM PST by TWhiteBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

Are sunglasses OK?


2 posted on 11/15/2014 7:06:15 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

I am used to the idea that any story from Saudi Arabia will be full of objectionable nonsense. But this one surprises even me.


3 posted on 11/15/2014 7:06:26 PM PST by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

Bummer

4 posted on 11/15/2014 7:06:31 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

“Only goats may give mohammetans tempting looks and instant arousal!” shouted the Sheikh.


5 posted on 11/15/2014 7:08:58 PM PST by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

6 posted on 11/15/2014 7:08:59 PM PST by kjam22 (my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: TWhiteBear

The women will have to wear those reflective sunglasses that cops like to wear. What a bunch of silly loons those Muslim men are…and obviously, completely lacking in self-control. Who would want to belong to such a ridiculous religion?


8 posted on 11/15/2014 7:09:18 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

Muslim men go sex crazy around female eyes.

They have no control over their sexual urges. Women must be segregated and invisible for them to feel numb.

How come men don’t have that problem in the West?


9 posted on 11/15/2014 7:09:44 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Are sunglasses OK?

I think ugly, dorky, nerdy sunglasses may be OK.
As long as the effect is not to inflame the passions of innocent pure men.
But the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice will have the final say.
TWB


10 posted on 11/15/2014 7:11:37 PM PST by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin, the Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

OH NO Tempting Sunglasses


11 posted on 11/15/2014 7:13:15 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

12 posted on 11/15/2014 7:16:07 PM PST by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear
I think ugly, dorky, nerdy sunglasses may be OK.

You're talking BC (birth control) frames.

This law is just an excuse for the religious police to stop any female they please. In the US, only bad cops use their authority to hit on women (or worse). In Saudi, the religious sadists are righteous about it.http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post#help

13 posted on 11/15/2014 7:17:02 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear
My first wife had "Bedroom Eyes", worst 2 1/2 years of my life..but the bedroom stuff was good..
14 posted on 11/15/2014 7:17:41 PM PST by PROCON (I love sleeping, it's like being dead without the commitment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

the women aren’t much better IMO.


15 posted on 11/15/2014 7:21:02 PM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

To enforce this the vice police have to wear tight fitting spandex pants. If a bulge appears the woman disappears.


16 posted on 11/15/2014 7:21:42 PM PST by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Beat me to it.


17 posted on 11/15/2014 7:22:23 PM PST by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
How about those 1980s robot sunglasses?



Or shuttershades?


18 posted on 11/15/2014 7:23:12 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

19 posted on 11/15/2014 7:24:04 PM PST by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

Doesn’t surprise me at all.


20 posted on 11/15/2014 7:24:20 PM PST by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson