Posted on 11/15/2014 3:09:02 AM PST by Fenhalls555
A neo-Nazi party from the city of Dortmund has reportedly demanded the city's mayor give them a list of all city's Jews, in an event eerily reminiscent of darker days in Germany's past. Luckily, the mayor refused and slammed the request, passing it on to legal authorities who are working to outlaw the party.
According to different reports, the party, known as Die Rechte (The Right), wrote a letter to Dortmund Mayor Ullrich Sierau through its lone city council member, Dennis Giemsch, requesting to know many Jews live in and around the city, as well as their addresses.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Hey dim bulb, I’m insensitive too! It isn’t rocket science to see the same mentalities of people who want to round up Jews and those who demand home addresses of political opponents. It starts with intimidation. Read a book.
Ohhh English. THAT explains it. I couldn’t quite put my finger on the unique, eccentric style of lunacy, combined with a lack of concern for gun owners.
Lol. .. Jake, , Elwood!
You smoked out another one.
You did not answer his question[s] either did you?
Thank you for sharing your manifesto. I bid you calm seas and prosperous voyage in your aspiration of one day attaining suffrage.
And I thought such people didn't exist anymore.
Give the people the Nazis’ addresses.
And do the same for Democrats.
The Nazis are the left.
Naziism is fascism, a form of socialism. Both are about total government control of the economy; they just use different methods and forms to achieve it.
Traditional socialism simply nationalizes or takes over the means of production. The fascist (Nazi) version of socialism is more subtle. it maintains the fiction of private property, while regulating every aspect of its use, thus completely controlling it, just as much as the traditional socialism does.
Our economy in America today is moving ever and ever closer to a fascist model.
You (GSC) have apparently bought the Big Lie of the Western Left that the Nazis were “right wing.”
They were not. The National Socialists were, indeed, socialists.
I encourage you to read up on this topic, as it is still a fundamental aspect of our modern political milieu. The American Left routinely attempts to tie the Right to the Nazis, when this is entirely inaccurate from a political philosophy standpoint.
I offer some resources and a quote.
HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1143131/posts
Hitler’s Handouts - Inside the Nazis’ welfare state
http://reason.com/archives/2007/08/15/hitlers-handouts
A quote from my FR profile page:
Although our modern socialists’ promise of greater freedom is genuine and sincere, in recent years observer after observer has been impressed by the unforeseen consequences of socialism, the extraordinary similarity in many respects of the conditions under “communism” and “fascism.” As the writer Peter Drucker expressed it in 1939, “the complete collapse of the belief in the attainability of freedom and equality through Marxism has forced Russia to travel the same road toward a totalitarian society of un-freedom and inequality which Germany has been following. Not that communism and fascism are essentially the same. Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion, and it has proved as much an illusion in Russia as in pre-Hitler Germany.”
No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933. The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. Their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common, was the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits made of the right timber, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom.
— F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom
And a clarification on the above quote - a “liberal of the old type” is what we would call a political conservative. Hayek was of course writing before “liberal” was adopted by the socialists since they had to run from that term.
To summarize, you should immediately cease assigning the Nazis to the Right, as you did. It is entirely inaccurate, and is the result of a concerted disinformation / Big Lie campaign by the Left.
These special anointed people who get to vote. Maybe we could call them peers, or lords, or some such title.
Fenhall doesn’t feel that he must answer the questions of “the little people”.
Evidently.
And he doesn’t like comparisons between the 1930’s national socialists and the modern day national socialists.
No he didn’t. Fenhall is a libertarian, kinda of a paleo-libertarian. I consider myself a constitutional libertarian.
Explain how it is holocaust denial to point out that national socialists today are the same as national socialists of “yesterday”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.