Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Australian warship sent to halt Russian flotilla bound for G20 in Brisbane
news.com.au ^ | 14th November 2014 | Ian McPhedran

Posted on 11/13/2014 12:01:17 PM PST by naturalman1975

A THIRD Australian warship has been dispatched to intercept a Russian flotilla steaming towards the G20 summit in Brisbane and a fourth navy vessel is ready to divert to the area.

The replenishment ship HMAS Sirius is heading into the Coral Sea to support the frigates HMAS Parramatta and HMAS Stuart and the frigate HMAS Sydney is preparing to divert from an exercise in New Zealand to join the mission, according to a government source.

Both Parramatta and Stuart are understood to be carrying Seahawk anti-submarine warfare helicopters, although defence sources said it was unlikely that a Russian submarine is in the area.

.....

It is understood that the Australian Defence Attache in the Russian capital has advised senior Russian military officers that the ships would be refused port access in Brisbane unless there was an emergency.

.....

Defence released a statement saying that Russian warships had been deployed to previous international summits including the 2009 APEC meeting in Singapore and the visit of President Medvedev to San Francisco in 2010.

Russian has increased its global military activity in recent weeks with submarine incursions in the Baltic, bomber flights over the Arctic and the Caribbean and the task group in the South Pacific.

(Excerpt) Read more at heraldsun.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: naturalman1975
but really it's the US we'd need, above all else. And that's why we've been a loyal ally for a long time now

How well has that worked out for the US's allies since obama and co. took over?

I am truly sorry about what my country has foisted upon the world.

21 posted on 11/13/2014 12:41:06 PM PST by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Australia has always been a good friend of the US but I wouldn’t count on Obama to have your back.


22 posted on 11/13/2014 12:44:26 PM PST by McGruff (The whole Omama Administration is a breach in protocol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

That so true I hope Vlady ratting war sabers


23 posted on 11/13/2014 12:44:47 PM PST by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Turbo Pig
How well has that worked out for the US's allies since obama and co. took over?

To be honest, not badly.

We still get intelligence information from the US that we couldn't (certainly not easily or readily) get ourselves. We still have access to American military hardware and similar for purchase under favourable conditions. We still get American logistical support in a wide range of areas when we need it.

It's not my place to criticise the elected leader of a friendly nation, so I won't comment on that. But I will say that America has a whole is still a very good ally to Australia - and a bloody good friend. I don't think any individual - no matter who they are - could cause any lasting damage to that.

24 posted on 11/13/2014 12:45:10 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

True but it is tough to predict or even anticipate all the possible illogical moves. This reminds me of all the probing done during the cold war. I agree also this will likely end after the summit is over.


25 posted on 11/13/2014 12:47:27 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Respectfully, this incident clearly demonstrates the need for our good friends in Australia, to reinvest in the submarine forces. My understanding is that the closest sub is too far away, to engage the Russians, in a timely fashion. Please understand I say this as your ally. Thanks.


26 posted on 11/13/2014 12:49:56 PM PST by jttpwalsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Halt? International waters...


27 posted on 11/13/2014 12:51:26 PM PST by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jttpwalsh
First of all, I wouldn't assume that the RAN is necessarily being entirely honest about where all our assets are in a case like this...

Secondly, I agree with you. We need to boost a lot of areas in our Navy. The two new LHDs will partly restore a capability we've been short of for a long time (and may eventually restore even more of that capability) as they come online, and are a step in the right direction, as will our new Air Warfare Destroyers - but we still need a lot of work.

Unfortunately it takes a long time to get back these capabilities once you lose them - the Labor government of the 1980s and 1990s made us a lot less capable, and since then - while things are getting better over time, I'd like to see it happen a lot faster.

28 posted on 11/13/2014 12:55:12 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OldNewYork

Yeah - I didn’t write the headline... sometimes I wish I could.


29 posted on 11/13/2014 12:56:44 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

You arent giving your nation enough credit. Particularly that Australia would have complete air supremecy with your Legacy and Super Bugs.

The Frigates keep their distance, use their helos to identify and track the Russian ships. The Bugs can prevent the Russian ships from using their helos for the same, and use standoff PGMs if needed.

It would get a lot more fun if some of your F/A-18Fs had already been converted to EA-18Gs.


30 posted on 11/13/2014 12:58:13 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

I hadn’t considered, but your point #1 is a good one.

I fully agree with point #3, and am concerned that we (USA) may be in a similar predicament, if not now, then soon.

All the best !


31 posted on 11/13/2014 12:59:15 PM PST by jttpwalsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
You arent giving your nation enough credit. Particularly that Australia would have complete air supremecy with your Legacy and Super Bugs.

Note - I'm talking about an actual (very unlikely) war situation, not the (almost as unlikely) event of the current situation deteriorating badly.

I actually think we could stop what Russia has in the area at the moment if we really needed to. We're not matching their forces, but we are putting something credible into the area which they wouldn't want to take on.

But if Russia seriously wanted to attack us, they'd be sending a lot more - and the situation would be considerably different.

Of course, in that case, I also think it'd be likely that (unless otherwise occupied by something at least equally serious), we'd have at least a US Carrier group sitting off our shores as quickly as it could be managed. I do consider the US to still be a very genuine ally who would come to our aid if it could - and it would be unusual not for that to happen.

32 posted on 11/13/2014 1:04:26 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Maybe not, but the United States is, and I expect it will remain so.

Oh, we're on your side, definitely. But the running-dog Kenyan in the White House definitely isn't. Shoot, he's not even on our side, and he's ostensibly our own President.

33 posted on 11/13/2014 1:08:18 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy (GOP wins - now hold their feet to the fire!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

I’d bet money there’s a US SSN attack boat or two in the vicinity.


34 posted on 11/13/2014 1:10:05 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

No worries - I knew it was the editorial page leaking onto the news page of the Herald Sun. You’re right though - it is a good opportunity to improve intel on the Russian fleet.


35 posted on 11/13/2014 1:11:16 PM PST by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; naturalman1975

The U.S, is a military ally of Australia, Australia is safe from this blustering Russia.


36 posted on 11/13/2014 1:15:19 PM PST by ansel12 (The churlish behavior of Obama over the next two years is going to be spellbinding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldNewYork

True but what is the big deal about this movement by the Russians? The American fleet goes everywhere. If anyone should get a little bugged, it should be the Chinese. They are trying to command some respect the Russkies sail right past without a thought.

It’s not exactly a Kirov battle group roaming the open seas. It’s two 30 year-old former Soviet warships.


37 posted on 11/13/2014 1:18:04 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

It seems to be the Russian response to an Australian shirtfronting, notable mainly for being unusual. True about the Chinese - hadn’t thought of that. But I don’t think the Russians worry too much about them.


38 posted on 11/13/2014 1:24:00 PM PST by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Don’t forget the Navy takes its orders ultimately from from its commander in chief. He won’t be sending attack boats.


39 posted on 11/13/2014 1:26:17 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xp38

To a great extent, nobama and putin are quite alike. When not doing so well, both just bring on the bluster and obtuse threats. If someone calls them out, they just act as if everyone really didn’t understand they were just acting theoretically and move on to something completely different.


40 posted on 11/13/2014 1:51:18 PM PST by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson