Skip to comments.
Obama: Regulate broadband Internet like a utility so it 'works for everyone'
cnet ^
| Nov 10, 2014
| Don Reisinger
Posted on 11/10/2014 1:49:18 PM PST by upchuck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: upchuck
Lack of competition is not what is hurting internet access in this country, regulatory pseudo-monopolies are the problem.
Going back to a system of so-called “natural monopolies” for broadband would make the situation a hundred times worse... unless you’re the CEO of Time-Warner.
This is simply crony capitalism at its best. Under this hair-brained idea, Obama’s furiously fellating friends over at the major media corporations would gain access to local monopolies, instead of having to compete with cable broadband providers, DSL providers, and wireless providers for lower rates and better speeds, your government would award an internet service provider monopoly to ONE provider in a given area — resulting in even higher prices, even lower quality of service, and enshrining Obama’s corporate sycophants in the media at the helm of monopolistic ISP control.
To: upchuck
The Internet has more or less evened the playing field that was once dominated by the Left/Marxists. They no longer control the flow of information the way they used to, so they want that control back. If Obama and the DemocRats are pushing for the FCC to regulate the Internet, you can bet that it won't be a good thing for freedom of speech and the free flow of information.
22
posted on
11/10/2014 2:07:12 PM PST
by
Major Matt Mason
("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
To: upchuck
So it will work for everyone? Obola, what do you know about work?
23
posted on
11/10/2014 2:08:26 PM PST
by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: upchuck
Yeh, like the IRS works for “everyone”!
24
posted on
11/10/2014 2:17:24 PM PST
by
SgtHooper
(Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
To: upchuck
“so it works for everybody”
“If you like your doctor or health care provider, you can keep them.”
“If you like your doctor you can keep your Doctor”
If my internet is working for me, can I keep it?
To: jameslalor
your government would award an internet service provider monopoly to ONE provider in a given area Yep, that's the end goal. Monopolies can rarely sustain without government coercion and this is one of those cases.
26
posted on
11/10/2014 2:26:19 PM PST
by
palmer
(Minnesota Is Monitoring 48 for Ebola, Already 12 Go Missing)
To: Major Matt Mason
27
posted on
11/10/2014 2:28:24 PM PST
by
upchuck
(The language of government now is word-spew. ~ h/t Peggy Noonan)
To: upchuck
“for everyone” even those who don’t pay a monthly bill?
28
posted on
11/10/2014 2:29:58 PM PST
by
bicyclerepair
(Linux rocks. TERM LIMITS ... TERM LIMITS)
To: upchuck
Defund the FCC to make sure the Internet keeps working for everyone.
29
posted on
11/10/2014 2:31:20 PM PST
by
ThePatriotsFlag
($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ DEFUND OBAMA! $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$)
To: upchuck; All
30
posted on
11/10/2014 2:33:15 PM PST
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Oliviaforever
Don’t get all worked up. If you want your internet, you can keep your internet. Or not.
To: upchuck
It does work for everyone, including Bambi’s terrorist bros. I guess he wants it restricted so it works ONLY for them.
32
posted on
11/10/2014 3:03:05 PM PST
by
livius
To: upchuck
Wait a minute...I thought we weren’t through with the $200 trillion program of wiring the schools for the internet yet! /s
33
posted on
11/10/2014 3:04:38 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(REPEAL OBAMACARE!! Hold the feet of the GOPe to the fire!)
To: upchuck
“...so it works for everyone.”
Begs the question:
For whom isn’t the internet working?
Splain that, Obami.
To: Chewbarkah
35
posted on
11/10/2014 4:09:37 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: upchuck
"Obama: Regulate broadband Internet like a utility so it 'works for everyone'
Coming from obama this means"
He's lying.
It means the opposite of what he says.
He's lying
The internet presents a personal threat to his ambitions.
He's lying
He wants the internet to fund his pet anti-citizen projects
He's lying
Divide and conquer.
Separate the means to carry out the 1st amendment from the people using class warfare tools of envy and revenge.
Same thing as regulating mouths but not what comes out of them. Just sew it up so you can only hear a murmur.
37
posted on
11/10/2014 5:39:48 PM PST
by
USCG SimTech
(Honored to serve since '71)
To: lepton
Supposedly, wireless Internet access has never been regulated by the FCC (by which I mean the presence of "network neutrality" regulation).
I pay ~$40/mo for wireless internet from T-Mobile.
It comes with free music streaming. (This is the part proponents of net neutrality hate.) Other than that, it works the same as any other access method. (dial-up, DSL, fibre, cable, &c.)
One last time, Obola: THE INTERNET IS NOT BROKEN.
__RVX
38
posted on
11/10/2014 6:38:43 PM PST
by
__rvx86
(minority. conservative.)
To: upchuck
Making folks like Sen. Ted Cruz look all the more popular.
39
posted on
11/11/2014 5:18:06 AM PST
by
Biggirl
To: USCG SimTech
Stuff like that WILL land up in the federal courts!
40
posted on
11/11/2014 5:18:49 AM PST
by
Biggirl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson