Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX
>>>>>>Why hasn't the rest of the world and the ICAO responded with a ban on Russian civil aviation on the international airways?<<<<

The rest of the world and the ICAO did not respond with a ban on American civil aviation on the international airways after shooting down Iran Air 655, although it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that Iran Air 655 was shor down by USS Vincennes

In the same vein, the rest of the world and the ICAO did not respond with a ban on Ukrainian civil aviation on the international airways after Ukraine shot down Air Siberia 1812 in 2001.

I wonder, on what grounds you would ban Russian civil aviation after an Ukrainian military pilot (most likely LTC Dmitro Yakatsuts), flying Ukraine military jet shot down civilian airliner?

7 posted on 12/08/2014 1:39:03 PM PST by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DTA

“The rest of the world and the ICAO did not respond with a ban on American civil aviation on the international airways after shooting down Iran Air 655, although it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that Iran Air 655 was shor down by USS Vincennes”

No, it was not “proven beyond reasonable doubt,” because the United States immediately acknowledged shooting down Iran Air 655. The ICAO had no proper reason to ban “American civil aviation”, because it was the Government of Iran and Iran Air who violated a wide assortment of laws and international air regulations by launching a civil airliner into an airspace subject to flight restrictions by a NOTAM during an unlawful naval engagement initiated by Iran.

“In the same vein, the rest of the world and the ICAO did not respond with a ban on Ukrainian civil aviation on the international airways after Ukraine shot down Air Siberia 1812 in 2001.”

Although it was initially unknown how Air Siberia 1812 was lost, it later appeared probable one of two missiles undergoing target testing against a drone on a Black Sea missile test range flew on past the drone target destroyed by the other missile, failed to self-destruct before departing the missile range, and flew on farther than thought possible to strike Air Siberia 1812. Yanukovych, Putin’s Russian agent and puppet, ordered his government to deny responsibility for the mishap. nonetheless, the Ukrainian government did negotiate compensation for the accident, whether or not it was willing to acknowledge responsibility.

“I wonder, on what grounds you would ban Russian civil aviation after an Ukrainian military pilot (most likely LTC Dmitro Yakatsuts), flying Ukraine military jet shot down civilian airliner?”

The Russian armed forces sent its own Buk anti-aircraft missile system and crew unlawfully into the Ukraine, targeted an international flight properly transmitting its civil aviation transponder codes on an internationally approved jet airway without NOTAM or any other notice and unlawfully shot down Flight MH-17 killing all aboard and lied about it. We have the photographs and video recordings to prove the movements of these Russian soldiers taking their Buk into and out of the Ukraine, with the fired missile absent when departing the Ukraine to hide the Russian responsibility. This case was a deliberate and utterly illegal act by Russia, deserving sanctions by the ICAO and the international community.

Your attempt to use the pathetically clumsy false propaganda contrived to blame the Ukrainians deserves its own severe sanctions as well.


9 posted on 12/09/2014 6:58:34 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson