Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Negro’ Is An Acceptable Term for Black Soldiers, U.S. Army Says
NYDN ^ | November 5, 2014 | GINGER ADAMS OTIS

Posted on 11/06/2014 2:59:25 PM PST by DogByte6RER

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: DogByte6RER

I’m about ready to move back to “Negro”. It is not a pejorative, especially if it is not intended to be. It was historically used in a non-pejorative way.

We gave up using it in the first round of “political correct” self-censorship, but the idea that “black” was more respectful than “negro” never made sense. But no one wants to offend, so we went with “black”. Then “african-american”. But to me “Negro” is the easiest and most respectful way to refer to your race, especially if you aren’t sensitive about it and no offense is intended.

So, I prefer “Negro”. Since I’m not Negro, though, and I don’t want to offend, I’ll stick with whatever people prefer to hear.


41 posted on 11/06/2014 6:12:55 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

I worked with an African American. His parents were Italian working in Africa. He was born in Ethiopia. Aa is not a racial designation, it us a nationality or geographic one.


42 posted on 11/06/2014 6:20:24 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson