Nancy perplexes me. She either really believes what she says, in which case she is delusional, or she is deliberately lying, which makes her psychopathic.
I just resolve it by deciding she is both.
She’s a lib. She believes it.
Her grandchildren and continuing generations in her family will never have to walk among the "great unwashed" so she has no fear of them overcrowding schools or spreading disease. That is for the little people, like the middle class, to deal with.
It’s vanity. She can’t bear being a failure, even though it is blatantly obvious she is one. The real question is if her party is “whipped” enough to keep her on.
Popcorn?
Well put — one is forced to conclude that Nancy is both delusional and psychopathic. “We have to pass the law to see what’s in it” is psychopathic, expressing a gleeful, reckless contempt for legislative responsibility. Saying that “voter suppression” resulted in the Republican wave is delusional — the only voter suppression was due to Dear Leader’s inability to do the one thing he at least used to be good at, namely, motivating the yutes and Holder’s people to get to the voting booth.
Well put — one is forced to conclude that Nancy is both delusional and psychopathic. “We have to pass the law to see what’s in it” is psychopathic, expressing a gleeful, reckless contempt for legislative responsibility. Saying that “voter suppression” resulted in the Republican wave is delusional — the only voter suppression was due to Dear Leader’s inability to do the one thing he at least used to be good at, namely, motivating the yutes and Holder’s people to get to the voting booth.