Kelley had someone from the National Journal today and he was very articulate. He corrected Obama’s logic when he intimated that because 2/3 of the electorate did not vote, they were sending a message that 2/3 were in support of him. Oh, yeah, really! I have never seen him before but I thought he was good.
I went to the site. Looks like good reading.
I supposed the Marxists have so completely discredited their own brand (as in "progressive" replacing "liberal") that they have to purposely create confusion with the National Review to take them seriously.