Hmmm....This looks very good for a Convention of the States.
I am sure Mark Levin will be mentioning this.
I am listening to him right now. Unfortunately, I can’t seem to grasp how this will be achieved.
Meanwhile, here is the link to the National Review article he was citing, about how what Repubs plan to do will help the business class and does not address the immediate screaming desires of the electorate.
It also points out the pitfalls of falling into Harry Reid’s maligning pulpit and the slavering maw of the media who seek to futher divide our party.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/392082/governing-trap-editors
“Republicans should also advance conservative ideas on taxes, jobs, energy, higher-education subsidies, and much else. For the most part that won’t involve either battle royale or deal-cutting with Obama; it will involve putting up legislation that Senate Democrats filibuster. And that’s all right: Obama won’t be on the ballot in 2016, but many Senate Democrats will.
So will Senate Republicans in many blue states. It would be better for them to be able to point to an attractive Republican agenda on bread-and-butter issues than to be able to say that they had passed trade-promotion authority.
To some extent, of course, they will be able to do both. They should move on trade-promotion authority, and more generally make progress where it is possible. But not much progress is possible until we have a better president. Getting one ought to be conservatism’s main political goal over the next two years.”