Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Met Office Doesn't Deserve a £97 Million Supercomputer. It Deserves to Be Scrapped.
Breitbart ^ | 11/02/2014 | JAMES DELINGPOLE

Posted on 11/02/2014 10:43:59 AM PST by logi_cal869

Earlier this week, the Met Office invited us to celebrate the fact that we had allowed to be siphoned from our pockets the £97 million it allegedly needed to build a new super-computer to "produce the most scientifically accurate short-term forecast that are scientifically possible."

(snip)

The mighty Booker's reservations can be summed up in one phrase: Garbage In, Garbage Out.

Which is to say that you can have the spiffiest, most bells-and-whistles super-computer in the world, but it'll still only be as good as the data you feed into it - and, of course, only as good as the algorithms it uses to make its projections.

On both scores, the Met Office will continue to fail dismally so long as it remains in the grip of a Warmist cabal which, in defiance of all real-world evidence, is ideologically committed to the bankrupt theory that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are the most significant driver of "climate change."

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; nasa
Every once in a while, we see more news leaking out about how those in power here, the UN and other countries still seek to enforce the paradigm shift to 'carbon tax' based on obviously fraudulent so-called science'.

For example, this post from yesterday asserts the IPCC is pushing 'ceasing use of fossil fuels by 2100'

http://www.utahpeoplespost.com/2014/11/ipcc-says-that-use-of-fossil-fuels-should-cease-by-2100/

With all this energy & resources (tax dollars...OUR money) being expended behind the scenes, with a parallel assault on the original mission of NASA on this side of the pond to make it more 'world-oriented & furthering the goals of the climate change alarmists'...

...one wonders what all these very-public distractions might be taking our attention away from...

The MSM is forced to tout headlines like, "Forecasters hit the mark on 2014 Atlantic hurricane season"...after severely downgrading their prior forecasts for stormier, warmer oceans.

http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news/new-orleans/margaret-orr-forecasters-hit-the-mark-on-2014-atlantic-hurricane-season/29476350

Months ago, they were touting the rising of ocean temperatures as evidence of AGW...now it's "Oops...it's El Nino"

Even NASA has gone silent after a June headline, "Hurricane season is coming! Nasa reveals oceans are approaching peak temperature to trigger extreme winds"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2649959/Hurricane-season-coming-Nasa-reveals-oceans-warming-summer-weather-patterns-begin.html

If even a normal earth event (El Nino) can't trigger the violent storms predicted by the global warming alarmists (Gore, IPCC et al), the idiom "garbage-in/garbage out" equates more with 'Ponzi Scheme'.

With so many assaults on our system on a near weekly basis, how can lowly American Conservatives make a difference in such government-created chaos?

Oh, yeah...vote & change the government. (for one)

(I do not, however, apologize for my tagline)

1 posted on 11/02/2014 10:43:59 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
only as good as the algorithms it uses to make its projections.

Problem is, they're AlGorisms.

2 posted on 11/02/2014 10:53:19 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
What is a "Met Office" ?

3 posted on 11/02/2014 11:08:41 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Having just returned from 4 weeks in the UK, I can say that their short term forecasts are not really that good.

In their eyes, the money is well spent to boost the Met Office’s daily accuracy to make their long term AGW dire predictions look more reasonable.


4 posted on 11/02/2014 11:10:33 AM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

British version of NOAA.


5 posted on 11/02/2014 11:11:17 AM PST by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
What is a “Met Office” ?


Check out their news headlines...

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/

6 posted on 11/02/2014 11:11:56 AM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

At least they are buying American....

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2014/cray-hpc


7 posted on 11/02/2014 11:13:29 AM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

42


8 posted on 11/02/2014 11:20:00 AM PST by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

If the science is settled, they don’t need a new supercomputer.


9 posted on 11/02/2014 11:34:46 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

Thank you. I was wondering why an opera company needed a supercomputer!


10 posted on 11/02/2014 11:53:26 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Within 5 minutes of turning on this computer government sponges will be surfing porn.


11 posted on 11/02/2014 12:31:10 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

The UK is very difficult place to forecast the weather. It is not like say southern California where a guess of sunny weather is almost always true. I doubt the supercomputer will enhance forecast accuracy.


12 posted on 11/02/2014 12:36:44 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Nice! I missed that!


13 posted on 11/02/2014 1:09:18 PM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
Nonsense article. The Met Office is a few miles down the road from where I live, and I know quite a number of people working there. This computer's function is only for short-term forecasting (up to five days), in which the Met Office's performance is already impressive, as good as any of it international peers. The climatology branch of the Met Office, about which this article complains, is virtually a separate organisaton, and this computer is not for its use.
14 posted on 11/03/2014 12:20:46 AM PST by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winniesboy
I see. /s

Beyond weather forecasting, the new supercomputer will also assist with climate change predictions. These simulations try to predict weather patterns years, decades and centuries in advance. The only way to do that at the moment is to reduce the resolution of the simulation.

The new super computer will allow better resolution in the climate predictions. Researchers will also be able to program more complex science into their simulations and test if they more accurately reflect the data.


15 posted on 11/03/2014 6:01:41 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson