Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado's Election Day nearly half over; signs of anxiety on the Left
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 10/30/2014 7:56:34 AM PDT by Din Maker

The state of Colorado has embarked on a far-reaching experiment this campaign season: Its 2014 election, featuring a high-profile contest between incumbent Democratic Sen. Mark Udall and Republican challenger Rep. Cory Gardner, is being conducted exclusively with mail-in ballots. Every voter in the state has received a ballot; if a person wants to vote on Election Day, he or she will have to take that ballot to what is called a voter service center, present it to officials and then vote.

It's expected most will opt to mail their ballots. And each day, as the ballots arrive, the Colorado secretary of state's office announces how many have been received from Republicans, from Democrats and from unaffiliated voters.

As of Wednesday, state officials had received 379,250 ballots from Republicans, 294,648 from Democrats, and 222,043 from unaffiliated voters. The total number of votes received so far, about 900,000, is more than half the 1.77 million cast in Colorado's 2010 Senate race.

In the high-turnout 2012 presidential election, there were 2.57 million votes cast. If, as expected, the Gardner-Udall race draws more voters than 2010 but fewer than 2012, the number of ballots received so far is a pretty substantial figure. And at the moment, they're looking good for Gardner and his fellow Republicans.

The ballots received also appear to lend credence to the RealClearPolitics average of polls showing Gardner leading by 3.3 percent. Now, with just days to go, some Colorado Republicans strategists believe the mail-in totals, plus the polls, are contributing to an atmosphere of desperation among some of Udall's supporters.

The latest evidence is a series of ads from NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado. The ads, released in versions for TV, radio and the Internet, are set at some unspecified point in the future, after Gardner has "banned birth control." For reasons that are not clear, condoms are still available in "Cory's world," but they are in scarce supply because other forms of birth control aren't available.

The ads feature a young couple in bed, apparently ready to have sex, when they discover they're out of condoms. The radio version of the ad begins with the sound of a door shutting. The man has been out searching for a condom to buy.

"They're all out," he says.

"Did you try the corner market?" the woman asks.

"Of course."

"Grocery store?"

"Sold out."

"Drug store?"

"C'mon."

"So everyone's sold out of condoms," the woman says.

"Hmmm. How did that happen?

"Cory Gardner banned birth control," the man explains. "And now it's all on us guys. And you can't find a condom anywhere. And the pill was just a start — "

At that point, the man goes off on a side track, complaining that Gardner wants to cut Pell Grants and doesn't believe in global warming. "Cory denies science," the man says.

"Don't let Cory's world become your world," the announcer says. "Keep Cory Gardner out of the Senate — and out of your bedroom."

The ad is not rooted in the actual events of the Colorado campaign. First, Gardner did come under attack from Democrats for once supporting so-called personhood measures, which opponents charged could lead to a ban of some forms of birth control. But Gardner has not only backed away from that support, he has also said he was wrong to have once favored the measure.

"I was wrong to have supported personhood because of the implications that it could have," Gardner told me in an interview last weekend. "The people of Colorado have soundly defeated [personhood], overwhelmingly, time and time again. If there is any possibility that it could impact contraception, that's not something that I support."

In addition, Gardner now advocates making the birth control pill available over-the-counter, without a prescription. Instead of banning birth control, he supports making it more readily available — precisely the opposite of what the NARAL ad says.

Colorado Republican strategists have become used to such attacks — there have been previous ads claiming Gardner would ban some forms of birth control — but the new NARAL spots struck them as particularly over-the-top. "With 900,000 ballots cast and Republicans leading Democrats by 90,000 votes, it's not surprising that they have gone from the nasty to the farcical," one strategist in the state told me Wednesday. "What they've been doing has not been working, so now they're trying to create late-night comedy."

Of course, no one is laughing. There are still perhaps a million ballots out there. And despite the lead in the polls, despite the lead in ballots received, Republicans still must worry whether the Democratic attacks can still change some minds in the last few days of this very contentious election.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2014midterms; co; co2014; colorado; earlyvoting; gardner; mailinballots; senateraces
This is good news, but, this "Ballots by Mail" is tailor-made for fraud. The Dems will hold onto all the ballots they've garnered from disinterested friends and family, houses and apartments from which people moved but the ballots were mailed and the ballots they buy on the streets....... Once they know how many votes they are coming up short, they will mail them in filled-out; straight Democrat Ticket votes.
1 posted on 10/30/2014 7:56:35 AM PDT by Din Maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76; Red Steel

.


2 posted on 10/30/2014 8:08:11 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

On the mailed in ballots...is there anything that is supposed to protect against fraud. Is there any attempt to match signatures, etc?


3 posted on 10/30/2014 8:08:24 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker
"Keep Cory Gardner out of the Senate — and out of your bedroom."

Desperation has its own unique stench.

4 posted on 10/30/2014 8:13:48 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne ("Don't be afraid. Just believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
On the mailed in ballots...is there anything that is supposed to protect against fraud. Is there any attempt to match signatures, etc?

LOL. I can't believe you asked.

The Dems are not going to *allow* Gardner to win. Bank on that.

5 posted on 10/30/2014 8:14:09 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/29/democrats-accused-of-posing-as-republican-election-judges-in-colorado/
Not sure I have seen this on FR but absolutely.


6 posted on 10/30/2014 8:23:20 AM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

I mailed mine in, but it is a horrible idea. I don’t trust it at all.


7 posted on 10/30/2014 8:24:09 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

So they supposedly compare signatures for a valid vote...What honest person could actually go along with this idea??? Republicans can’t possibly win...


8 posted on 10/30/2014 8:50:14 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

The reports of ballots received are very useful for the Democrats. They will know the numbers of ballots that they need. You may register and vote on election day and you may not be challenged if you affirm that you are eligible. All the Democrats need to know is the number of votes needed so that they can charter the required numbers of buses and fill them up with “voters” from surrounding states.


9 posted on 10/30/2014 9:15:18 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Well, they’re supposed to,

but there was a story yesterday where ‘rat operatives misrepresented themselves as republican poll watchers and were intentionally letting obviously unmatched signatures go in as valid ballots.


10 posted on 10/30/2014 9:17:42 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob; All

On the mailed in ballots...is there anything that is supposed to protect against fraud. Is there any attempt to match signatures, etc?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Not to my knowledge. State Office holders have even commented that it will be easy for vote fraud, but the DemocRAT controlled State Legislature pushed it through. The law even allows for “Ballot Harvesters” to pick up ballots and mail them for people who might be elederly, infirmed or whatever. All they have to do is get the person to sign and they take it from there.


11 posted on 10/30/2014 9:18:23 AM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker; Cowboy Bob; All

Here is a direct link to the undercover video of Udall staffers planning and agreeing to vote fraud:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_uHDjk3fSc


12 posted on 10/30/2014 9:23:02 AM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yes there is an attempt to match signatures. But even that process is ripe for fraud.

When ballots are received, a check is made to “match” or more likely “guess” if the signature is the same as the signature at the time of registration. This is very subjective. If accepted, then the vote is allowed.

If not accepted, then the ballot is supposed to go through a process where the voter is verified. However, the ballot could be tossed without the voter ever knowing. Remember the reviewer has already seen the person’s voter registration.

I also do not trust that mail in ballots are not being “extra marked”. This is a process where the ballot has extra marks placed on them by the ballot reviewer. By placing an X over their vote and marking a different candidate in a race, the review could effectively nullify the vote in that election.

I have heard of other possible tactics such as ballot harvesting, and ballot box stuffing. In fact, there are already video files of Dem campaign managers ENCOURAGING such illegal activity.

I hope and pray that the GOP takes control of both the state house and senate this election cycle here in Colorado and reverses this. The senate is very possible, the house less so. Of course, getting Hickenlooper out of the Governorship is also necessary.


13 posted on 10/30/2014 9:39:12 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: laplata
Colorado's Election Day nearly half over; signs of anxiety on the Left

The panicky Dem operatives should go to the landfills where they will find the majority of their ballots in the mountains of trash LoL.


14 posted on 10/30/2014 10:23:29 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

LOL

They’re panicking like I have never seen before.


15 posted on 10/30/2014 12:10:19 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
They will know the numbers of ballots that they need.

Post Office workers would be in the best place to garner blank mail-in ballots. :-(

16 posted on 10/30/2014 2:20:19 PM PDT by Does so (SCOTUS Newbies Imperil USA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

It was here.


17 posted on 10/30/2014 2:21:15 PM PDT by Does so (SCOTUS Newbies Imperil USA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson