Posted on 10/27/2014 7:41:03 PM PDT by Bettyprob
With a little more than a week remaining before the mid-term elections, most conservatives are focusing upon a dozen Senate races, as Republicans are expected to gain control of the upper chamber.
But the contest that piques my interest the most is the gubernatorial race in Wisconsin, where Republican Governor Scott Walker is locked in a dogfight with Democratic challenger Mary Burke. Walker’s re-election is very much in doubt, despite the accomplishments of his first term: putting Wisconsin’s fiscal house back in order, reforming the state’s collective bargaining process, and giving local communities greater control over their affairs.
According to a Marquette Law School poll released on October 15, Walker and Burke are in a dead heat, with 47 of likely voters preferring each. The dial hasn’t moved much since. Exactly a week later, a Rasmussen poll had Burke up by one; the following day, a St. Norbert College/Wisconsin Public Radio poll had Walker up by one. A quintessential toss-up.
Should Walker prevail, he will have, in the space of four years, outlasted the occupation of the state legislature by union and other left-wing activists, survived a recall election—the first governor in U.S. history to do so—and earned a second term in his own right, all while governing as a conservative in one of the bluest states in the nation. Liberal organizations have dedicated more time and money to beating Walker than any other Republican, and yet Walker has taken everything these liberal groups have thrown his way and still come out on top.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
That would be Minnesota. Wisconsin is more of a bratwurst state.
‘He seems a little bland, but he definitely has the ability to get positive things done. He may really be the smartest man in the room.’
“’Reminds me of Calvin Coolidge’”
Sounds Like He Can Use Some Help !
His defeat is a defeat for the whole movement!
I can vote for WALKER at the top of the ticket.
Who was it that said ‘be careful arguing with idiots or after while its hard to tell the difference’?
jus’ sayin ...
Ted Cruz is our man in 2016. Walker should’ve been our man in 2012.
Me too.
I hope he wins, but I much prefer Cruz. He is the rare, Reagan-sized talent.
-— Walker’s definitely someone we want in the primary mix. -—
We can’t afford a primary mix of ten Tea Party candidates and one Establishment-funded candidate. This is the traditional formula for defeat. We MUST unite behind Ted NOW.
LOL The ticket to hell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.